Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3071 - 3080 of 44636 for part.

United Capitol Insurance Company v. Bartolotta's Fireworks Company, Inc.
. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions. Before Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8469 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donald R. Wield
body part or object, of the complainant’s or defendant’s intimate parts if that intentional touching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5584 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey R. Schertz
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Waupaca County: John P. Hoffmann, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15619 - 2010-07-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: SARAH B. O’BRIEN, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78861 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Kenneth Neiman as successor in interest to Stripe-N-Seal Corporation v. Thunder Pallet, Inc.
for Waukesha County: ROBERT G. MAWDSLEY, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. No. 96-2213
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11202 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: KATHRYN W. FOSTER, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53888 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Brown County: MARK A. WARPINSKI, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96628 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Donald R. Wield
or through clothing by the use of any body part or object, of the complainant’s or defendant’s intimate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5584 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96628 - 2008-06-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
impaired economic viability. (b) If the acquisition of only part of a property would leave its owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=383246 - 2021-07-01