Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3071 - 3080 of 58479 for speedy trial.
Search results 3071 - 3080 of 58479 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
to as “Programs”). The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32809 - 2014-09-15
to as “Programs”). The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32809 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Modesto Javier Melendez appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered after a jury trial, for one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244032 - 2019-07-17
). Modesto Javier Melendez appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered after a jury trial, for one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244032 - 2019-07-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 ¶1 DUGAN, J. Theophilous Ruffin appeals a judgment of conviction and an order from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347582 - 2021-03-16
2 ¶1 DUGAN, J. Theophilous Ruffin appeals a judgment of conviction and an order from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347582 - 2021-03-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion seeking a new trial due to ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The No. 2015AP2488-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190962 - 2017-09-21
motion seeking a new trial due to ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The No. 2015AP2488-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190962 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
appeals from the trial court’s order denying his pro se motion for a new trial based on ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28362 - 2007-03-12
appeals from the trial court’s order denying his pro se motion for a new trial based on ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28362 - 2007-03-12
[PDF]
State v. Matthew S. Carlson
that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for substitution of counsel before trial, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7164 - 2017-09-20
that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for substitution of counsel before trial, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7164 - 2017-09-20
State v. Arthur L. Robinson
. §§ 940.19(5), 941.30(1), and 939.63 (1997‑98).[1] Robinson argues that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4547 - 2005-03-31
. §§ 940.19(5), 941.30(1), and 939.63 (1997‑98).[1] Robinson argues that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4547 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael Mirr
postconviction motion. Mirr claims the trial court erred: (1) in advising the jury panel during voir dire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14118 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion. Mirr claims the trial court erred: (1) in advising the jury panel during voir dire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14118 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael Mirr
postconviction motion. Mirr claims the trial court erred: (1) in advising the jury panel during voir dire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14118 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. Mirr claims the trial court erred: (1) in advising the jury panel during voir dire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14118 - 2005-03-31
State v. Norbert W. Ellis
counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the effectiveness of his trial counsel or otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5860 - 2005-03-31
counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the effectiveness of his trial counsel or otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5860 - 2005-03-31