Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3071 - 3080 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 3071 - 3080 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Jess K. Quinn
the judgment and order. ¶2 Quinn’s first argument is that the trial court erroneously sentenced him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25583 - 2006-06-20
the judgment and order. ¶2 Quinn’s first argument is that the trial court erroneously sentenced him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25583 - 2006-06-20
[PDF]
State v. James D. Minniecheske
2 act against local government officials. After sentencing, the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12044 - 2017-09-21
2 act against local government officials. After sentencing, the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12044 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard J. Wooster
that the enactment of Chapter 980, Stats., operates as a new factor that the trial court should consider in imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8229 - 2014-09-22
that the enactment of Chapter 980, Stats., operates as a new factor that the trial court should consider in imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8229 - 2014-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS
”). The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in merely declaring that Shilbauer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32809 - 2005-03-31
”). The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in merely declaring that Shilbauer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32809 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 ¶1 DUGAN, J. Theophilous Ruffin appeals a judgment of conviction and an order from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347582 - 2021-03-16
2 ¶1 DUGAN, J. Theophilous Ruffin appeals a judgment of conviction and an order from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347582 - 2021-03-16
State v. Matthew S. Carlson
argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for substitution of counsel before trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7164 - 2005-03-31
argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for substitution of counsel before trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7164 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David W. Stokes
by a felon, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm the trial court's refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7784 - 2017-09-19
by a felon, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm the trial court's refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7784 - 2017-09-19
State v. Linda B.-S.
to Jamie Lyn and Casey James B.-S. She contends that the trial court erred by concluding that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9793 - 2005-03-31
to Jamie Lyn and Casey James B.-S. She contends that the trial court erred by concluding that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9793 - 2005-03-31
Certification
Is the failure to object to the closure of a public trial to be analyzed upon appellate review under
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89987 - 2012-12-04
Is the failure to object to the closure of a public trial to be analyzed upon appellate review under
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89987 - 2012-12-04
[PDF]
State v. Michael Mirr
postconviction motion. Mirr claims the trial court erred: (1) in advising the jury panel during voir dire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14118 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion. Mirr claims the trial court erred: (1) in advising the jury panel during voir dire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14118 - 2014-09-15