Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3071 - 3080 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 3071 - 3080 of 58458 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court properly denied Booker’s presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75288 - 2011-12-20
that the trial court properly denied Booker’s presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75288 - 2011-12-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
it was candy. The matter proceeded to trial where the jury heard Borges’s confession, viewed J.C.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808449 - 2024-06-04
it was candy. The matter proceeded to trial where the jury heard Borges’s confession, viewed J.C.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808449 - 2024-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion seeking a new trial due to ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The No. 2015AP2488-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190962 - 2017-09-21
motion seeking a new trial due to ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The No. 2015AP2488-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190962 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Arthur L. Robinson
), 941.30(1), No. 01-2942-CR 2 and 939.63 (1997-98).1 Robinson argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4547 - 2017-09-20
), 941.30(1), No. 01-2942-CR 2 and 939.63 (1997-98).1 Robinson argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4547 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
appeals from the trial court’s order denying his pro se motion for a new trial based on ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28362 - 2007-03-12
appeals from the trial court’s order denying his pro se motion for a new trial based on ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28362 - 2007-03-12
[PDF]
State v. David W. Stokes
by a felon, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm the trial court's refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7784 - 2017-09-19
by a felon, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm the trial court's refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7784 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Matthew S. Carlson
that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for substitution of counsel before trial, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7164 - 2017-09-20
that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for substitution of counsel before trial, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7164 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Michael R. Wolfe v. Nathen Saloch
appeals from a judgment rendered after a trial to the court involving a landlord-tenant dispute. Wolfe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9719 - 2017-09-19
appeals from a judgment rendered after a trial to the court involving a landlord-tenant dispute. Wolfe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9719 - 2017-09-19
State v. Linda B.-S.
to Jamie Lyn and Casey James B.-S. She contends that the trial court erred by concluding that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9793 - 2005-03-31
to Jamie Lyn and Casey James B.-S. She contends that the trial court erred by concluding that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9793 - 2005-03-31
State v. Arthur L. Robinson
. §§ 940.19(5), 941.30(1), and 939.63 (1997‑98).[1] Robinson argues that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4547 - 2005-03-31
. §§ 940.19(5), 941.30(1), and 939.63 (1997‑98).[1] Robinson argues that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4547 - 2005-03-31