Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3071 - 3080 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 3071 - 3080 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Barbara J. Dipasquale v. Benn S. Dipasquale
a judgment granting her divorce from Benn S. Dipasquale. She challenges the trial court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8457 - 2017-09-19
a judgment granting her divorce from Benn S. Dipasquale. She challenges the trial court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8457 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
to as “Programs”). The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32809 - 2014-09-15
to as “Programs”). The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32809 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James D. Minniecheske
2 act against local government officials. After sentencing, the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12044 - 2017-09-21
2 act against local government officials. After sentencing, the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12044 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard J. Wooster
that the enactment of Chapter 980, Stats., operates as a new factor that the trial court should consider in imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8229 - 2005-03-31
that the enactment of Chapter 980, Stats., operates as a new factor that the trial court should consider in imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8229 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
”). The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in merely declaring that Shilbauer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32809 - 2005-03-31
”). The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in merely declaring that Shilbauer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32809 - 2005-03-31
Douglas L. Arents v. ANR Pipeline Company
for a new trial on several grounds: (1) the trial court erroneously excluded expert testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6553 - 2005-05-09
for a new trial on several grounds: (1) the trial court erroneously excluded expert testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6553 - 2005-05-09
State v. Matthew S. Carlson
argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for substitution of counsel before trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7164 - 2005-03-31
argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for substitution of counsel before trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7164 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David W. Stokes
by a felon, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm the trial court's refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7784 - 2017-09-19
by a felon, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm the trial court's refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7784 - 2017-09-19
State v. Linda B.-S.
to Jamie Lyn and Casey James B.-S. She contends that the trial court erred by concluding that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9793 - 2005-03-31
to Jamie Lyn and Casey James B.-S. She contends that the trial court erred by concluding that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9793 - 2005-03-31
Certification
Is the failure to object to the closure of a public trial to be analyzed upon appellate review under
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89987 - 2012-12-04
Is the failure to object to the closure of a public trial to be analyzed upon appellate review under
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89987 - 2012-12-04