Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30701 - 30710 of 63530 for records.

[PDF] State v. Rex E. Wollenberg
. Id., ¶17. ¶5 Wollenberg alleges none of those errors 2 and even if he did, the record reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6623 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Paul R. Sharpley, Jr. v. Paul R. Sharpley III
of the record, we uphold the trial court’s factual findings because they are not clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4291 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
of Coopman’s testimony. Van Dinter testified about several inconsistencies in the records. She noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27895 - 2007-01-22

[PDF] State v. Robert W. Huber
is conclusory in nature, or if the record conclusively shows the appellant is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6043 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
inconsistencies in the records. She noted that a “wet prep” test revealed no bacteria, semen, parasites
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27895 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
: Sustained. Move on, [Mary’s counsel]. [Mary’s counsel]: For the record, Your Honor, I think one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107371 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 124
September through mid-November. It is clear from the record that Lister’s counsel was unaware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32904 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
treatment record, that the individual would be a proper subject for commitment if treatment were withdrawn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590981 - 2022-11-17

[PDF] State v. Daniel L. Terens
of the trial court’s reasoning, we will uphold the trial court’s decision if there are facts in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19149 - 2017-09-21

Mary C. Pentinmaki v. Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr.
the record supports the court's findings. Also, the court did not err when it rejected Attorney Pangman's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9059 - 2005-03-31