Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30701 - 30710 of 58285 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Everton Taylor
to deliver, as a party to a crime, following a jury trial. He argues that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3438 - 2017-09-19

State v. William E. Draughon III
” under § 940.22(1)(i) was error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the matter for a new trial. Draughon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18636 - 2005-07-26

Randy O'Neill v. James Reemer
to perform logging services.[1] The trial court concluded that Wis. Stat. § 893.33(2) precluded the O’Neills
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4362 - 2005-03-31

State v. Henry L. Williams
a waiver for revocation of probation.” The trial court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3155 - 2005-03-31

State v. Patrick Greer
. Prior to trial, the court ordered evidence that Libke and Greer met while serving time in the La Crosse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12385 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Joseph J. Hammill
) his trial counsel was ineffective by arguing the wrong legal standard regarding his collateral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24997 - 2017-09-21

Steven C. Lamphier v. Ronald Ferber
, and an order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues there was insufficient evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18594 - 2005-06-20

[PDF] State v. Sean M. Daley
, the trial court approved the agreement, Daley entered his new plea, and filed a plea questionnaire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24775 - 2017-09-21

State v. Joseph J. Hammill
he was deprived of his constitutional right to counsel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24997 - 2006-06-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Because we conclude that they are, and because the evidence at trial was sufficient for a jury to so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81525 - 2014-09-15