Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30701 - 30710 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 30701 - 30710 of 58483 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial, concluding Runamuk had failed to prove that the Neville Party caused any damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207816 - 2018-01-30
trial, concluding Runamuk had failed to prove that the Neville Party caused any damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207816 - 2018-01-30
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
challenging his pleas and sentences and also alleging he was denied the effective assistance of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016904 - 2025-10-01
challenging his pleas and sentences and also alleging he was denied the effective assistance of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016904 - 2025-10-01
[PDF]
Eric Foster v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
(Progressive) appeals the trial court’s judgment finding the reducing clause in the underinsured motorist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6707 - 2017-09-20
(Progressive) appeals the trial court’s judgment finding the reducing clause in the underinsured motorist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6707 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudiced at trial by the State and the circuit court’s failure to follow certain trial procedures. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064687 - 2026-01-21
prejudiced at trial by the State and the circuit court’s failure to follow certain trial procedures. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064687 - 2026-01-21
Scott R. Wilke v. Judith A. Wilke
On December 19, 1994, a trial court granted Scott R. Wilke and Judith A. Wilke a judgment of divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10554 - 2005-03-31
On December 19, 1994, a trial court granted Scott R. Wilke and Judith A. Wilke a judgment of divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10554 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
assistance of his trial attorney, and a challenge to a portion of his sentence.[2] There is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129268 - 2014-11-13
assistance of his trial attorney, and a challenge to a portion of his sentence.[2] There is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129268 - 2014-11-13
COURT OF APPEALS
) is an unconstitutional violation of equal protection because it provides for a jury of six in chapter 51 trials, while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87624 - 2013-11-25
) is an unconstitutional violation of equal protection because it provides for a jury of six in chapter 51 trials, while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87624 - 2013-11-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
plea to possessing cocaine as a second or subsequent offense. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102465 - 2017-09-21
plea to possessing cocaine as a second or subsequent offense. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102465 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
sufficient to warrant sentence modification, and that both his trial counsel and postconviction counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1073044 - 2026-02-04
sufficient to warrant sentence modification, and that both his trial counsel and postconviction counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1073044 - 2026-02-04
[PDF]
State v. David R. Kaster
the trial court erred when it failed to give his proposed jury instruction interpreting “school staff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5622 - 2017-09-19
the trial court erred when it failed to give his proposed jury instruction interpreting “school staff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5622 - 2017-09-19