Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30701 - 30710 of 43138 for t o.
Search results 30701 - 30710 of 43138 for t o.
Deborah Martin-Semrow v. Marc Raymond Semrow
of the guardian’s fees concludes with the statement that “[t]he court may enforce its orders under this subsection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13612 - 2005-03-31
of the guardian’s fees concludes with the statement that “[t]he court may enforce its orders under this subsection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13612 - 2005-03-31
State v. Isabel Gomez
to the court's statement, “[T]he court further notes that the burden of proof in a refusal case is only probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9584 - 2005-03-31
to the court's statement, “[T]he court further notes that the burden of proof in a refusal case is only probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9584 - 2005-03-31
Terrence J. Woods v.
of a person whose license to practice law in Wisconsin has been suspended. ¶18 DAVID T. PROSSER, J., did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17385 - 2005-03-31
of a person whose license to practice law in Wisconsin has been suspended. ¶18 DAVID T. PROSSER, J., did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17385 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reached the same conclusion as we do, that is, “[t]he plea colloquy was adequate and shows the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40232 - 2009-08-31
reached the same conclusion as we do, that is, “[t]he plea colloquy was adequate and shows the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40232 - 2009-08-31
Douglas County v. Steven Leinweber
from a judgment of the circuit court for Douglas County: MICHAEL T. LUCCI, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2225 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment of the circuit court for Douglas County: MICHAEL T. LUCCI, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2225 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
prefaced his opening argument with the following remarks: [T]his is a case about a violation of family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31968 - 2008-02-27
prefaced his opening argument with the following remarks: [T]his is a case about a violation of family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31968 - 2008-02-27
State v. Douglas E. Fitch
because the court commented that “[t]here is a heavier burden to withdraw a plea when we are dealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4719 - 2005-03-31
because the court commented that “[t]here is a heavier burden to withdraw a plea when we are dealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4719 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dorian H.
) other things, "[t]he adequacy and suitability of facilities, services and procedures available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9278 - 2017-09-19
) other things, "[t]he adequacy and suitability of facilities, services and procedures available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9278 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at the time the offense was committed. The DNA analyst testified that “[t]he longer DNA is on an item
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806596 - 2024-05-29
at the time the offense was committed. The DNA analyst testified that “[t]he longer DNA is on an item
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806596 - 2024-05-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals 2019-01-09T07:57:50-0600 CCAP-CDS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231686 - 2019-01-09
will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals 2019-01-09T07:57:50-0600 CCAP-CDS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231686 - 2019-01-09