Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30711 - 30720 of 62306 for child support.
Search results 30711 - 30720 of 62306 for child support.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to report about.” Cursey therefore contends the officers’ testimony would have supported his claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534919 - 2022-06-22
to report about.” Cursey therefore contends the officers’ testimony would have supported his claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534919 - 2022-06-22
[PDF]
Eleanor Delach v. County of Price
, 748 (1947). The singular use of the word "area" supports the trial court's interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14249 - 2014-09-15
, 748 (1947). The singular use of the word "area" supports the trial court's interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14249 - 2014-09-15
State v. William T. Ackerman
) whether Ackerman’s detention for sobriety tests was supported by reasonable suspicion; (3) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11637 - 2005-03-31
) whether Ackerman’s detention for sobriety tests was supported by reasonable suspicion; (3) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11637 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Samuel Terry
to support the possession charge during the revocation proceedings, precluded the State from subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15885 - 2017-09-21
to support the possession charge during the revocation proceedings, precluded the State from subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15885 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
three facts that he contends would defeat a conclusion that the search was supported by reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2008-09-16
three facts that he contends would defeat a conclusion that the search was supported by reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2008-09-16
Ramakrishna Rao Settipalli v. Sandesha Rao Settipalli
. This finding is not clearly erroneous; it is supported by substantial evidence in the record. Regardless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7119 - 2005-03-31
. This finding is not clearly erroneous; it is supported by substantial evidence in the record. Regardless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7119 - 2005-03-31
Alonzo R. Gimenez, M.D. v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
, claiming that it need only set forth facts which, in the Board's opinion, support a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9927 - 2005-03-31
, claiming that it need only set forth facts which, in the Board's opinion, support a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9927 - 2005-03-31
Charlie Tate, Jr. v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin
the proffered evidence, and because there was sufficient evidence to support the future pain and suffering award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16331 - 2005-03-31
the proffered evidence, and because there was sufficient evidence to support the future pain and suffering award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16331 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to determine that a factual basis existed to support her pleas. She contends these failures resulted in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792646 - 2024-04-24
to determine that a factual basis existed to support her pleas. She contends these failures resulted in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792646 - 2024-04-24
[PDF]
Jami L. Van Boxtel v. Brent F. Van Boxtel
. The respondent continued to challenge the validity of the agreement. He presented evidence to support his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17480 - 2017-09-21
. The respondent continued to challenge the validity of the agreement. He presented evidence to support his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17480 - 2017-09-21