Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30711 - 30720 of 59656 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 30711 - 30720 of 59656 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
the arbitration hearing your daughter claims she does not know what she saw. Mrs. Anderson, you daughter claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33176 - 2008-06-25
the arbitration hearing your daughter claims she does not know what she saw. Mrs. Anderson, you daughter claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33176 - 2008-06-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filed a postconviction motion, alleging a new factor. Specifically, he claimed that his “treatment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732531 - 2023-11-29
filed a postconviction motion, alleging a new factor. Specifically, he claimed that his “treatment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732531 - 2023-11-29
[PDF]
State v. Gregory Jordan
evidentiary objection, defendant waived claim of error). Finally, we note that it was appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10995 - 2017-09-19
evidentiary objection, defendant waived claim of error). Finally, we note that it was appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10995 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Bergner’s claim of prejudice was “nothing more than speculation,” as Bergner had “provided no support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964107 - 2025-06-03
that Bergner’s claim of prejudice was “nothing more than speculation,” as Bergner had “provided no support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964107 - 2025-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 31, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
sentencing relief.[1] He claimed that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26959 - 2006-10-30
sentencing relief.[1] He claimed that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26959 - 2006-10-30
State v. Keith A. Glass
(1999-2000).[1] Glass claims: (1) because the photographic array used to identify him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4323 - 2005-03-31
(1999-2000).[1] Glass claims: (1) because the photographic array used to identify him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4323 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Arbor Vitae-Woodruff Joint School District No. 1 v. Gulf Insurance Company
under the contract.” Gulf contends that § 779.14(2), a statute of limitations, precludes the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3835 - 2017-09-20
under the contract.” Gulf contends that § 779.14(2), a statute of limitations, precludes the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3835 - 2017-09-20
State v. Larry E. Prust
Wis. Stat. ch. 980. ¶5 Prust’s first claim is that there was no proof that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5068 - 2005-03-31
Wis. Stat. ch. 980. ¶5 Prust’s first claim is that there was no proof that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5068 - 2005-03-31
State v. Da Vang
. We are not persuaded. ¶19 A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel presents a mixed question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2366 - 2005-03-31
. We are not persuaded. ¶19 A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel presents a mixed question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2366 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not deficient, nor prejudicial. Paine appeals. ¶5 To prevail on an ineffective assistance claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43844 - 2014-09-15
was not deficient, nor prejudicial. Paine appeals. ¶5 To prevail on an ineffective assistance claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43844 - 2014-09-15