Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30711 - 30720 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 30711 - 30720 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Wisconsin Real Estate Co. LLC (“WREC”). Following a bench trial, the circuit court determined that WREC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745627 - 2023-12-28
of Wisconsin Real Estate Co. LLC (“WREC”). Following a bench trial, the circuit court determined that WREC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745627 - 2023-12-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) his trial counsel was ineffective related to his admission. I conclude that although the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996561 - 2025-08-14
) his trial counsel was ineffective related to his admission. I conclude that although the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996561 - 2025-08-14
Mary Jane M. v. Milwaukee County
guardian of her developmentally disabled daughter, Mary K.M. Mary Jane contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26501 - 2006-09-18
guardian of her developmentally disabled daughter, Mary K.M. Mary Jane contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26501 - 2006-09-18
[PDF]
Mary Jane M. v. Milwaukee County
daughter, Mary K.M. Mary Jane contends that the trial court erred in dismissing her petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26501 - 2017-09-21
daughter, Mary K.M. Mary Jane contends that the trial court erred in dismissing her petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26501 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 28, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
, the circuit court scheduled the jury trial for March 1, 2010. Bonner was to be tried on one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58199 - 2010-12-27
, the circuit court scheduled the jury trial for March 1, 2010. Bonner was to be tried on one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58199 - 2010-12-27
State v. La Rae J. Schell
. The parties’ confusion may partly be explained by the trial court’s reliance on Wis. Stat. § 973.03(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5287 - 2005-03-31
. The parties’ confusion may partly be explained by the trial court’s reliance on Wis. Stat. § 973.03(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5287 - 2005-03-31
James M. Gibson v. Overnite Transportation Company
are excessive; and (4) the trial court erred by not requiring the jury to find that the damages were caused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5928 - 2005-03-31
are excessive; and (4) the trial court erred by not requiring the jury to find that the damages were caused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5928 - 2005-03-31
Otis Elevator Co. v. Fulcrum Construction Co.
the construction project was cancelled. The trial court concluded that Northwestern was not entitled to payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25979 - 2006-08-29
the construction project was cancelled. The trial court concluded that Northwestern was not entitled to payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25979 - 2006-08-29
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
sufficient to warrant sentence modification, and that both his trial counsel and postconviction counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1073044 - 2026-02-04
sufficient to warrant sentence modification, and that both his trial counsel and postconviction counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1073044 - 2026-02-04
[PDF]
State v. La Rae J. Schell
explained by the trial court’s reliance on WIS. STAT. § 973.03(4) to determine it had the power
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5287 - 2017-09-19
explained by the trial court’s reliance on WIS. STAT. § 973.03(4) to determine it had the power
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5287 - 2017-09-19