Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30721 - 30730 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 30721 - 30730 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filed a postconviction motion, alleging a new factor. Specifically, he claimed that his “treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732531 - 2023-11-29
filed a postconviction motion, alleging a new factor. Specifically, he claimed that his “treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732531 - 2023-11-29
[PDF]
CLE FILING INSTRUCTIONS
On-Demand courses, and Pro Bono work. You may also claim the Exemption, Waiver, or Comity provisions
/services/attorney/docs/25clefilinginstructions.pdf - 2025-12-18
On-Demand courses, and Pro Bono work. You may also claim the Exemption, Waiver, or Comity provisions
/services/attorney/docs/25clefilinginstructions.pdf - 2025-12-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Laboratory” for DNA testing. He claimed that prior to trial, the trial court had “ordered the Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980324 - 2025-07-08
Laboratory” for DNA testing. He claimed that prior to trial, the trial court had “ordered the Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980324 - 2025-07-08
Justin Pichler v. United States Fire Insurance Company
claims of alleged negligence: (1) the school did not “send Blythers home as soon as he was suspended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14002 - 2005-03-31
claims of alleged negligence: (1) the school did not “send Blythers home as soon as he was suspended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14002 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry E. Prust
to commitment under WIS. STAT. ch. 980. ¶5 Prust’s first claim is that there was no proof that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5068 - 2017-09-19
to commitment under WIS. STAT. ch. 980. ¶5 Prust’s first claim is that there was no proof that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5068 - 2017-09-19
State v. William M. Schleck
. Schleck appeals his conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OMVWI). He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2653 - 2005-03-31
. Schleck appeals his conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OMVWI). He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2653 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not pursue an arguably meritorious claim for additional sentence credit. Appellate counsel elected instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768603 - 2024-02-27
not pursue an arguably meritorious claim for additional sentence credit. Appellate counsel elected instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768603 - 2024-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Meade moved to vacate his conviction, alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68343 - 2014-09-15
Meade moved to vacate his conviction, alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68343 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
federal sentence, rather than consecutively. He claimed the circuit court was not fully aware of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-15
federal sentence, rather than consecutively. He claimed the circuit court was not fully aware of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-15
Village of Thiensville v. Jon R. Olsen
not stated to the trial court, Olsen’s claim apparently was that the high test score was due to the vodka
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14276 - 2005-03-31
not stated to the trial court, Olsen’s claim apparently was that the high test score was due to the vodka
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14276 - 2005-03-31