Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30731 - 30740 of 83499 for case code.
Search results 30731 - 30740 of 83499 for case code.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the State’s motion to amend the Information after the State rested its case at trial. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183333 - 2017-09-21
the State’s motion to amend the Information after the State rested its case at trial. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183333 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to “reopen” his 1989 criminal case so that his postconviction motion could be considered. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138236 - 2017-09-21
to “reopen” his 1989 criminal case so that his postconviction motion could be considered. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138236 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to modify the maximum sentences imposed in three jointly handled cases following the revocation of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102254 - 2017-09-21
to modify the maximum sentences imposed in three jointly handled cases following the revocation of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102254 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
had paid the remaining damages, and that the parties were agreeing to dismiss the case, “subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175345 - 2017-09-21
had paid the remaining damages, and that the parties were agreeing to dismiss the case, “subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175345 - 2017-09-21
State v. James D. Miller
in this case to set the context for Miller’s response, and not for its own truth or value as opinion evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3137 - 2005-03-31
in this case to set the context for Miller’s response, and not for its own truth or value as opinion evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3137 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=487504 - 2022-02-24
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=487504 - 2022-02-24
State v. Robert P. Eggimann
at issue in this case is a “technical” defect. Id. at ¶14. A technical defect does not thwart personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2381 - 2005-03-31
at issue in this case is a “technical” defect. Id. at ¶14. A technical defect does not thwart personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2381 - 2005-03-31
State v. Hiram Johnson
conviction on both counts is barred by statute. We remand the case for further proceedings. Johnson’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11498 - 2005-03-31
conviction on both counts is barred by statute. We remand the case for further proceedings. Johnson’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11498 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=569114 - 2022-09-22
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=569114 - 2022-09-22
[PDF]
State v. Cory C. Reed-Daniels
this is a completely supportable, provable case. The State was generous with Mr. Reed- Daniels. I could have issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24692 - 2017-09-21
this is a completely supportable, provable case. The State was generous with Mr. Reed- Daniels. I could have issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24692 - 2017-09-21