Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30731 - 30740 of 98490 for civil court case status online.
Search results 30731 - 30740 of 98490 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
on the court’s calendar had superiority due to pending speedy trial demands or age of the case. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87247 - 2012-09-17
on the court’s calendar had superiority due to pending speedy trial demands or age of the case. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87247 - 2012-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS
no duty either to defend or to indemnify Vagenius. We agree with the circuit court that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78237 - 2012-02-21
no duty either to defend or to indemnify Vagenius. We agree with the circuit court that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78237 - 2012-02-21
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 28, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49247 - 2010-04-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 28, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49247 - 2010-04-27
COURT OF APPEALS
motion showing that a circuit court judge who did not preside over his case admitted in an unrelated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97905 - 2013-06-10
motion showing that a circuit court judge who did not preside over his case admitted in an unrelated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97905 - 2013-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS
of this case, as we do below. ¶4 Fitzgibbon argues that the court erred in concluding that Haefner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30504 - 2007-10-03
of this case, as we do below. ¶4 Fitzgibbon argues that the court erred in concluding that Haefner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30504 - 2007-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case is whether the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when it set aside, as a sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49875 - 2010-05-10
in this case is whether the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when it set aside, as a sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49875 - 2010-05-10
COURT OF APPEALS
to affirm the circuit court in this case. ¶4 The County relies primarily on State v. Kasian, 207 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34375 - 2008-10-22
to affirm the circuit court in this case. ¶4 The County relies primarily on State v. Kasian, 207 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34375 - 2008-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 16, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29033 - 2007-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 16, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29033 - 2007-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 20, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32727 - 2008-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 20, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32727 - 2008-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 8, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28936 - 2007-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 8, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28936 - 2007-05-07