Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30751 - 30760 of 59392 for quit claim deed.
Search results 30751 - 30760 of 59392 for quit claim deed.
Mary C. Volker v. Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr.
offered no evidence in support of his motion, claiming that the portion of the September 20, 1994, order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8372 - 2005-03-31
offered no evidence in support of his motion, claiming that the portion of the September 20, 1994, order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8372 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Town of Waterford v. Gary R. Anderson
of the administrative code, nowhere does the motion recite a claim of lack of prior written notice. Moreover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14256 - 2014-09-15
of the administrative code, nowhere does the motion recite a claim of lack of prior written notice. Moreover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14256 - 2014-09-15
State v. Armando T. Trevino, Jr.
a sentence in recognition that the maximum penalty was forty years.[5] We turn to Trevino’s claim that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11819 - 2005-03-31
a sentence in recognition that the maximum penalty was forty years.[5] We turn to Trevino’s claim that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11819 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald A. Lesavage
investigated the accident scene. When Tomas asked Lesavage the cause of the accident, he claimed he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15409 - 2005-03-31
investigated the accident scene. When Tomas asked Lesavage the cause of the accident, he claimed he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15409 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ismael T. Lopez
Lopez appeals pro se from orders denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] motion. Lopez claims: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24604 - 2006-03-27
Lopez appeals pro se from orders denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] motion. Lopez claims: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24604 - 2006-03-27
A.B. Schmitz Agency, Inc. v. Edward Wendel
in the contract. Wendel's next claim pertains to the damages determination. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9096 - 2005-03-31
in the contract. Wendel's next claim pertains to the damages determination. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9096 - 2005-03-31
Barbara B. v. Dorian H.
) to recognize extrajudicial child support payments in only very limited circumstances. When a payer claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6672 - 2005-03-31
) to recognize extrajudicial child support payments in only very limited circumstances. When a payer claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6672 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
provision in their briefs. We, likewise, discuss it no further. 3 Hill also claimed that the mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694867 - 2023-08-29
provision in their briefs. We, likewise, discuss it no further. 3 Hill also claimed that the mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694867 - 2023-08-29
Frontsheet
that the estate would be ready to close after she obtained the release of a claim. On December 12, 2002, Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30289 - 2007-09-13
that the estate would be ready to close after she obtained the release of a claim. On December 12, 2002, Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30289 - 2007-09-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. A defendant claiming a violation of this right must show that the disputed information was inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123271 - 2017-09-21
. A defendant claiming a violation of this right must show that the disputed information was inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123271 - 2017-09-21