Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30761 - 30770 of 98490 for civil court case status online.
Search results 30761 - 30770 of 98490 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
Supreme Court Pending Rules Petitions
for original action cases involving state legislative redistricting, Court’s own motion 10/14/2002 03
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18069 - 2017-09-21
for original action cases involving state legislative redistricting, Court’s own motion 10/14/2002 03
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18069 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of a circuit court’s decision to dismiss a case with prejudice is limited to whether the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82382 - 2012-05-14
of a circuit court’s decision to dismiss a case with prejudice is limited to whether the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82382 - 2012-05-14
COURT OF APPEALS
in the present case. The court imposed a sentence consisting of seven and one-half years’ initial confinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121153 - 2014-09-08
in the present case. The court imposed a sentence consisting of seven and one-half years’ initial confinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121153 - 2014-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This case will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35807 - 2009-03-09
. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This case will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35807 - 2009-03-09
COURT OF APPEALS
claims established the law of the case. “A decision on a legal issue by an appellate court establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34836 - 2008-12-08
claims established the law of the case. “A decision on a legal issue by an appellate court establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34836 - 2008-12-08
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30622 - 2007-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30622 - 2007-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
the claim and the circuit court entered summary judgment in Hefter’s favor. The case went to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29258 - 2007-06-05
the claim and the circuit court entered summary judgment in Hefter’s favor. The case went to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29258 - 2007-06-05
COURT OF APPEALS
in light of his [or her] experience.” Circuit courts must “decide on a case-by-case basis, evaluating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34399 - 2008-10-27
in light of his [or her] experience.” Circuit courts must “decide on a case-by-case basis, evaluating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34399 - 2008-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 972.11 as applied in this case. [3] The trial court’s ruling recognized the disconnection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36394 - 2009-05-05
. Stat. § 972.11 as applied in this case. [3] The trial court’s ruling recognized the disconnection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36394 - 2009-05-05
COURT OF APPEALS
the case on summary judgment. Schmidt first argues that the circuit court failed to follow proper summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112697 - 2014-05-21
the case on summary judgment. Schmidt first argues that the circuit court failed to follow proper summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112697 - 2014-05-21