Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30761 - 30770 of 48550 for her.

[PDF] State v. Robert F.
). No. 96-0844 -5- based on his history and that Robert's previous counselor told her that Robert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10589 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. David P. Gascoigne
to place him in her squad car. Nelson searched Gascoigne before placing him in Peterson’s patrol car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13684 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Gail Ann Ernst v. Samuel Adolph Ernst
was not employed outside of the home for the first twelve years of the marriage. In 1984 she began her current
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9001 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] James Logic v. City of South Milwaukee Board of Canvassers
, in her official capacity as the City Clerk for the City of South Milwaukee.” Without citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7567 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
a § 974.06 motion is sufficient on its face to entitle a defendant to an evidentiary hearing on his or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03

CA Blank Order
in Milwaukee. Dixon presented an alibi defense. His sister testified that Dixon was at her home
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131836 - 2014-12-22

COURT OF APPEALS
, which provided a reasonable basis for her belief that Walker was armed, Joan Zajac, another store
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88531 - 2012-10-22

[PDF] State v. Richard L. Harris
). To prove deficient performance, a defendant must show that his or her counsel made errors so serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10759 - 2017-09-20

Jason M. Byford v. Michael Edwards
At an evidentiary hearing on the reconsideration motion, Edwards’s mother testified that her son did not reside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2787 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
in light of his or her training and experience under all of the facts and circumstances present. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85468 - 2012-07-25