Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30761 - 30770 of 55951 for so.
Search results 30761 - 30770 of 55951 for so.
[PDF]
State v. Dannie Thomas
are inappropriate when the acts for which punishment is to be imposed are so close in time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12758 - 2017-09-21
are inappropriate when the acts for which punishment is to be imposed are so close in time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12758 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The court considered no improper factors, and the eight-year sentence is not arguably so excessive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133306 - 2017-09-21
. The court considered no improper factors, and the eight-year sentence is not arguably so excessive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133306 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP1541-CRNM 2 of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. Upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324729 - 2021-01-20
. No. 2020AP1541-CRNM 2 of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. Upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324729 - 2021-01-20
Allen L.W. v. Ann Marie W.
actions so he could assert his parental rights. In March, while the paternity actions here remained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9773 - 2005-03-31
actions so he could assert his parental rights. In March, while the paternity actions here remained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9773 - 2005-03-31
State v. Titus Graham
stated: “The defendant has been found guilty of four serious crimes and so when we talk about lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6687 - 2005-03-31
stated: “The defendant has been found guilty of four serious crimes and so when we talk about lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6687 - 2005-03-31
H. James Oberg v. Donald W. Helgesen
the Obergs' claim for rescission, but did not discuss any reason for doing so, apparently because the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9005 - 2005-03-31
the Obergs' claim for rescission, but did not discuss any reason for doing so, apparently because the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9005 - 2005-03-31
Racine County Human Services Department v. Olivia G.
, but it was in Milwaukee county and Olivia did not want to be that far from home. So, the court said that “until a place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6546 - 2005-03-31
, but it was in Milwaukee county and Olivia did not want to be that far from home. So, the court said that “until a place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6546 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig M. Molstad
, but refused to do so and instead requested a trial. That ends the matter because there is no evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10241 - 2005-03-31
, but refused to do so and instead requested a trial. That ends the matter because there is no evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10241 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
did so properly because up to that point no new question, since February 2013, had been raised about
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131172 - 2014-11-30
did so properly because up to that point no new question, since February 2013, had been raised about
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131172 - 2014-11-30
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence, we look at whether “‘the evidence, viewed most favorably to the state and the conviction, is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69503 - 2011-08-15
of the evidence, we look at whether “‘the evidence, viewed most favorably to the state and the conviction, is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69503 - 2011-08-15