Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30771 - 30780 of 63317 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 30771 - 30780 of 63317 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
of Milwaukee.” The trial court granted that motion. ¶4 The State also moved to amend the beginning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143982 - 2015-07-06
of Milwaukee.” The trial court granted that motion. ¶4 The State also moved to amend the beginning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143982 - 2015-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS
Division.” (Case No. 07CV4436.) A writ was issued and, in response, DWD submitted a motion to quash
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35893 - 2009-03-17
Division.” (Case No. 07CV4436.) A writ was issued and, in response, DWD submitted a motion to quash
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35893 - 2009-03-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment. The motion asserted that this is a “toxic tort” case, for which expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666528 - 2023-06-13
judgment. The motion asserted that this is a “toxic tort” case, for which expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666528 - 2023-06-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
murder. The circuit court denied the motion and we affirm. Background ¶2 In February 2003, Russell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30629 - 2014-09-15
murder. The circuit court denied the motion and we affirm. Background ¶2 In February 2003, Russell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30629 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert A. Ragsdale
in denying his motion to suppress. Because the trial court did not err in denying Ragsdale’s suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6980 - 2005-03-31
in denying his motion to suppress. Because the trial court did not err in denying Ragsdale’s suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6980 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 47
[Pender’s] choice of reading material and his political views.” ¶5 Pender also filed discovery motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31842 - 2014-09-15
[Pender’s] choice of reading material and his political views.” ¶5 Pender also filed discovery motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31842 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Finance Service Corporation v. Harold E. Drees
, Finance Service moved for default judgment. At a May 4 hearing on the motion, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19833 - 2017-09-21
, Finance Service moved for default judgment. At a May 4 hearing on the motion, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19833 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to suppress evidence obtained by the Marquette County Sheriff’s Department on the grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83738 - 2012-06-20
motion to suppress evidence obtained by the Marquette County Sheriff’s Department on the grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83738 - 2012-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
(2005-06), he moved to withdraw his guilty plea to felony murder. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30629 - 2007-10-22
(2005-06), he moved to withdraw his guilty plea to felony murder. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30629 - 2007-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal. Koll argues that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36099 - 2009-04-07
denying his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal. Koll argues that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36099 - 2009-04-07