Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30781 - 30790 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 30781 - 30790 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. One 1997 Ford F-150
, the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over him. Alternatively, Beck contends that the term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5744 - 2017-09-19
, the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over him. Alternatively, Beck contends that the term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5744 - 2017-09-19
State v. William E. Draughon III
” under § 940.22(1)(i) was error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the matter for a new trial. Draughon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18636 - 2005-07-26
” under § 940.22(1)(i) was error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the matter for a new trial. Draughon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18636 - 2005-07-26
[PDF]
State v. Sean M. Daley
, the trial court approved the agreement, Daley entered his new plea, and filed a plea questionnaire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24775 - 2017-09-21
, the trial court approved the agreement, Daley entered his new plea, and filed a plea questionnaire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24775 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this 1 The Honorable Dale L. English presided over the trial and all motions through December 2022
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048389 - 2025-12-10
that this 1 The Honorable Dale L. English presided over the trial and all motions through December 2022
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048389 - 2025-12-10
[PDF]
State v. Joseph J. Hammill
) his trial counsel was ineffective by arguing the wrong legal standard regarding his collateral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24997 - 2017-09-21
) his trial counsel was ineffective by arguing the wrong legal standard regarding his collateral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24997 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
intoxicated and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Stanley contends the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31105 - 2014-09-15
intoxicated and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Stanley contends the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31105 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for another offense. Alexander pled guilty. The trial court accepted Alexander’s plea and ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107311 - 2017-09-21
for another offense. Alexander pled guilty. The trial court accepted Alexander’s plea and ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107311 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court erroneously prohibited his expert witness from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377513 - 2021-06-15
is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court erroneously prohibited his expert witness from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377513 - 2021-06-15
[PDF]
WI APP 58
. A trial to the court was held on January 19, 2022. The parties submitted post-trial briefing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718520 - 2023-12-19
. A trial to the court was held on January 19, 2022. The parties submitted post-trial briefing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718520 - 2023-12-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of Pendergast’s personal property; and (2) the circuit court scheduled a trial for October 14, 2004. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31873 - 2014-09-15
of Pendergast’s personal property; and (2) the circuit court scheduled a trial for October 14, 2004. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31873 - 2014-09-15