Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30791 - 30800 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 30791 - 30800 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Jeanne M. Lindskog v. Ronald P. Lindskog
a family business approximately a month before trial and that the income from the family business should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14264 - 2005-03-31
a family business approximately a month before trial and that the income from the family business should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14264 - 2005-03-31
State v. Henry L. Williams
a waiver for revocation of probation.” The trial court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3155 - 2005-03-31
a waiver for revocation of probation.” The trial court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3155 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
frivolous and awarding PLS sanctions, and dismissing, after a bench trial, his claims against Steven Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85730 - 2012-08-07
frivolous and awarding PLS sanctions, and dismissing, after a bench trial, his claims against Steven Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85730 - 2012-08-07
Jeanne M. Lindskog v. Ronald P. Lindskog
a family business approximately a month before trial and that the income from the family business should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13688 - 2005-03-31
a family business approximately a month before trial and that the income from the family business should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13688 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(2003-04), a Class B misdemeanor. After a first trial, and for reasons that are not important here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63594 - 2011-05-04
(2003-04), a Class B misdemeanor. After a first trial, and for reasons that are not important here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63594 - 2011-05-04
[PDF]
State v. William E. Draughon III
” under § 940.22(1)(i) was error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the matter for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18636 - 2017-09-21
” under § 940.22(1)(i) was error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the matter for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18636 - 2017-09-21
Jane Doe v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation
judgment. She claims the trial court erred in granting GMAC’s motion for summary judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2685 - 2005-03-31
judgment. She claims the trial court erred in granting GMAC’s motion for summary judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2685 - 2005-03-31
Steven C. Lamphier v. Ronald Ferber
, and an order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues there was insufficient evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18594 - 2005-06-20
, and an order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues there was insufficient evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18594 - 2005-06-20
[PDF]
Charlene M. Potkay v. City of Marinette
a Jaycees-sponsored outdoor event that included a concert. The trial court determined that as a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8741 - 2017-09-19
a Jaycees-sponsored outdoor event that included a concert. The trial court determined that as a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8741 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-04), a Class B misdemeanor. After a first trial, and for reasons that are not important here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63594 - 2014-09-15
-04), a Class B misdemeanor. After a first trial, and for reasons that are not important here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63594 - 2014-09-15