Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30791 - 30800 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 30791 - 30800 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Adolph F. Cebula v. Thomas Cotter
conclude that the trial court granted summary judgment to Cotter, and did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2635 - 2017-09-19
conclude that the trial court granted summary judgment to Cotter, and did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2635 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court erroneously prohibited his expert witness from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377513 - 2021-06-15
is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court erroneously prohibited his expert witness from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377513 - 2021-06-15
State v. One 1997 Ford F-150
having provided Beck with an authenticated copy of the summons and, as a result, the trial court lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5744 - 2005-03-31
having provided Beck with an authenticated copy of the summons and, as a result, the trial court lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5744 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William E. Draughon III
” under § 940.22(1)(i) was error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the matter for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18636 - 2017-09-21
” under § 940.22(1)(i) was error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the matter for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18636 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial. Stanley contends the circuit court erred when it instructed the jury on the operation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31105 - 2007-12-11
for a new trial. Stanley contends the circuit court erred when it instructed the jury on the operation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31105 - 2007-12-11
Robert B. Ciarpaglini v. Kelly Flury
issuance before the motion was filed. The trial court had the file and would have seen the postmark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10722 - 2005-03-31
issuance before the motion was filed. The trial court had the file and would have seen the postmark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10722 - 2005-03-31
Jeanne M. Lindskog v. Ronald P. Lindskog
a family business approximately a month before trial and that the income from the family business should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14264 - 2005-03-31
a family business approximately a month before trial and that the income from the family business should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14264 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Earl Steele III
of his plea. Trial counsel answered affirmatively. In addition to asking Steele if he had thoroughly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2174 - 2017-09-19
of his plea. Trial counsel answered affirmatively. In addition to asking Steele if he had thoroughly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2174 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert B. Ciarpaglini v. Kelly Flury
the order’s issuance before the motion was filed. The trial court had the file and would have seen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10722 - 2017-09-20
the order’s issuance before the motion was filed. The trial court had the file and would have seen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10722 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
(2003-04), a Class B misdemeanor. After a first trial, and for reasons that are not important here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63594 - 2011-05-04
(2003-04), a Class B misdemeanor. After a first trial, and for reasons that are not important here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63594 - 2011-05-04