Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3081 - 3090 of 69399 for as he.
Search results 3081 - 3090 of 69399 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
intentional homicide, theft of moveable property and possession of an illegally obtained prescription. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=428792 - 2021-09-22
intentional homicide, theft of moveable property and possession of an illegally obtained prescription. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=428792 - 2021-09-22
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Simmons
of Campbell’s home. Simmons later testified that he parked on the opposite side of the street about two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5489 - 2017-09-19
of Campbell’s home. Simmons later testified that he parked on the opposite side of the street about two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5489 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joe J. Davis
that Davis waived his objection to the timeliness of trial when he pled guilty, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2256 - 2005-03-31
that Davis waived his objection to the timeliness of trial when he pled guilty, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2256 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stephen E. Lee
failed to timely file a criminal complaint. Lee also takes issue with his sentence. First, he asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14485 - 2005-03-31
failed to timely file a criminal complaint. Lee also takes issue with his sentence. First, he asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14485 - 2005-03-31
State v. Asa V.D.
, he asserts that the record does not support a finding of contempt. This court concludes that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14882 - 2005-03-31
, he asserts that the record does not support a finding of contempt. This court concludes that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14882 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgments of conviction entered upon his no contest pleas. O’Brien argues he is entitled to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91837 - 2014-09-15
judgments of conviction entered upon his no contest pleas. O’Brien argues he is entitled to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91837 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI 96
of Jenkins' motion. ¶3 Jenkins contends that he offered a fair and just reason, namely a misunderstanding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29703 - 2007-07-11
of Jenkins' motion. ¶3 Jenkins contends that he offered a fair and just reason, namely a misunderstanding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29703 - 2007-07-11
[PDF]
WI 96
that he offered a fair and just reason, namely a misunderstanding of the consequences of his plea
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29703 - 2014-09-15
that he offered a fair and just reason, namely a misunderstanding of the consequences of his plea
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29703 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 35
about why he returned to the home of one of the victims in the middle of the night. He further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539546 - 2022-10-11
about why he returned to the home of one of the victims in the middle of the night. He further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539546 - 2022-10-11
[PDF]
Frontsheet
that it was investigating allegations of possible misconduct a few weeks later, it advised him that he should
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243445 - 2019-07-09
that it was investigating allegations of possible misconduct a few weeks later, it advised him that he should
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243445 - 2019-07-09