Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3081 - 3090 of 3970 for davie.
Search results 3081 - 3090 of 3970 for davie.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2024CV51 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV NANCY DAVIS, TYE M. GUSTINA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026784 - 2025-10-23
. No. 2024CV51 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV NANCY DAVIS, TYE M. GUSTINA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026784 - 2025-10-23
Association of State Prosecutors v. Milwaukee County and the
v. Milwaukee County Amicus curiae brief was filed by Michael R. Burton and Burton & Davis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16887 - 2005-03-31
v. Milwaukee County Amicus curiae brief was filed by Michael R. Burton and Burton & Davis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16887 - 2005-03-31
James Antisdel v. City of Oak Creek Police and Fire Commission
-respondents-petitioners there were briefs by Kathy L. Nusslock, Nancy L. Pirkey and Davis & Kuelthau, S.C
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17340 - 2005-03-31
-respondents-petitioners there were briefs by Kathy L. Nusslock, Nancy L. Pirkey and Davis & Kuelthau, S.C
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17340 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 42
. The confrontation right applies to statements that are “testimonial,” Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 821 (2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46522 - 2011-01-03
. The confrontation right applies to statements that are “testimonial,” Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 821 (2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46522 - 2011-01-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STENGEL, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2019AP1554 2 ¶1 DAVIS, J.1 “John”2 appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256774 - 2020-03-25
. STENGEL, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2019AP1554 2 ¶1 DAVIS, J.1 “John”2 appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256774 - 2020-03-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, [or] flagrant[.]” Sentry Ins. v. Davis, 2001 WI App 203, ¶21 n.8, 247 Wis. 2d 501, 634 N.W.2d 553 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946231 - 2025-04-22
, [or] flagrant[.]” Sentry Ins. v. Davis, 2001 WI App 203, ¶21 n.8, 247 Wis. 2d 501, 634 N.W.2d 553 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946231 - 2025-04-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
physically.” Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 315 (1974) (citation omitted). The “primary interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982962 - 2025-07-16
physically.” Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 315 (1974) (citation omitted). The “primary interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982962 - 2025-07-16
Tony Chaney v. Rudy Renteria
. 1690 (1996); Rimmer-Bey v. Brown, 62 F.3d 789, 790-91 (6th Cir. 1995); Davis v. Finney, 902 P.2d 498
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8142 - 2005-03-31
. 1690 (1996); Rimmer-Bey v. Brown, 62 F.3d 789, 790-91 (6th Cir. 1995); Davis v. Finney, 902 P.2d 498
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8142 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gregory Robinson
independently. See State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d 513, 519, 545 N.W.2d 244 (Ct. App. 1996). DISCUSSION ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3878 - 2005-03-31
independently. See State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d 513, 519, 545 N.W.2d 244 (Ct. App. 1996). DISCUSSION ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3878 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 25
dismissing a case as improvidently granted is proper. See State ex rel. Davis v. Cir. Ct. for Dane Cnty
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974581 - 2025-06-24
dismissing a case as improvidently granted is proper. See State ex rel. Davis v. Cir. Ct. for Dane Cnty
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974581 - 2025-06-24