Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30801 - 30810 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 30801 - 30810 of 58492 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
personal property; and (2) the circuit court scheduled a trial for October 14, 2004. ¶4 A pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31873 - 2008-02-19
personal property; and (2) the circuit court scheduled a trial for October 14, 2004. ¶4 A pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31873 - 2008-02-19
Randy O'Neill v. James Reemer
to perform logging services.[1] The trial court concluded that Wis. Stat. § 893.33(2) precluded the O’Neills
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4362 - 2005-03-31
to perform logging services.[1] The trial court concluded that Wis. Stat. § 893.33(2) precluded the O’Neills
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4362 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial. Stanley contends the circuit court erred when it instructed the jury on the operation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31105 - 2007-12-11
for a new trial. Stanley contends the circuit court erred when it instructed the jury on the operation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31105 - 2007-12-11
[PDF]
State v. William E. Draughon III
” under § 940.22(1)(i) was error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the matter for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18636 - 2017-09-21
” under § 940.22(1)(i) was error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the matter for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18636 - 2017-09-21
Steven C. Lamphier v. Ronald Ferber
, and an order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues there was insufficient evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18594 - 2005-06-20
, and an order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues there was insufficient evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18594 - 2005-06-20
State v. Henry L. Williams
a waiver for revocation of probation.” The trial court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3154 - 2005-03-31
a waiver for revocation of probation.” The trial court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3154 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Earl Steele III
of his plea. Trial counsel answered affirmatively. In addition to asking Steele if he had thoroughly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2174 - 2017-09-19
of his plea. Trial counsel answered affirmatively. In addition to asking Steele if he had thoroughly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2174 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-04), a Class B misdemeanor. After a first trial, and for reasons that are not important here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63594 - 2014-09-15
-04), a Class B misdemeanor. After a first trial, and for reasons that are not important here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63594 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
frivolous and awarding PLS sanctions, and dismissing, after a bench trial, his claims against Steven Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85730 - 2012-08-07
frivolous and awarding PLS sanctions, and dismissing, after a bench trial, his claims against Steven Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85730 - 2012-08-07
[PDF]
State v. Patrick Greer
accomplice. Prior to trial, the court ordered evidence that Libke and Greer met while serving time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12385 - 2017-09-21
accomplice. Prior to trial, the court ordered evidence that Libke and Greer met while serving time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12385 - 2017-09-21