Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30811 - 30820 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 30811 - 30820 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Raphael R. Montello
a motion to suppress evidence seized under the warrant, for the reason he now argues on appeal. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9432 - 2005-03-31
a motion to suppress evidence seized under the warrant, for the reason he now argues on appeal. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9432 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
will grant the motion. Counsel does not state how much time he requires to prepare a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134126 - 2015-01-28
will grant the motion. Counsel does not state how much time he requires to prepare a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134126 - 2015-01-28
CA Blank Order
appeals and moves to extend appellate deadlines to permit Smith to pursue a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142306 - 2015-05-18
appeals and moves to extend appellate deadlines to permit Smith to pursue a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142306 - 2015-05-18
CA Blank Order
sentencing in this matter. Counsel has responded, advising he now wishes to file a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102871 - 2013-10-07
sentencing in this matter. Counsel has responded, advising he now wishes to file a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102871 - 2013-10-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, J. In this no-merit case, counsel for the appellant has filed what we construe as a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179026 - 2017-09-21
, J. In this no-merit case, counsel for the appellant has filed what we construe as a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179026 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Peter A. Fonte
, Defendant-Appellant. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 2005 WI 77 Reported at: 281 Wis. 2d 654, 698
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20054 - 2017-09-21
, Defendant-Appellant. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 2005 WI 77 Reported at: 281 Wis. 2d 654, 698
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20054 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the appeal, and extend the time to file a postconviction motion. The ground is that counsel has identified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143370 - 2017-09-21
the appeal, and extend the time to file a postconviction motion. The ground is that counsel has identified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143370 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. Counsel has responded, advising she now wishes to file a postconviction motion. Counsel therefore seeks
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108633 - 2014-02-27
. Counsel has responded, advising she now wishes to file a postconviction motion. Counsel therefore seeks
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108633 - 2014-02-27
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
there would be arguable merit to a postconviction motion challenging the DNA surcharge ordered at sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99931 - 2014-09-15
there would be arguable merit to a postconviction motion challenging the DNA surcharge ordered at sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99931 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Daniel G. Scheidell
-Appellant. ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Previously reported at: 227 Wis. 2d 285, 595 N.W.2d 661
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17265 - 2017-09-21
-Appellant. ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Previously reported at: 227 Wis. 2d 285, 595 N.W.2d 661
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17265 - 2017-09-21