Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30811 - 30820 of 44191 for name change.

[PDF] Karen Wipperfurth v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
that there was “little, if any, evident job change” between the duties of the respondents’ classified and unclassified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15323 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. John Lee Osgood, Sr.
of whether sexual contact occurred. No. 94-2103 -5- amendment did not change the factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8012 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
amendments to the statute have changed the language in such a way that Bruneau’s holding has effectively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48910 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
appropriate to make change. This evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s conclusion that Heart
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163021 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
that he should be allowed to change his theory of the case, even at this late stage, because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93274 - 2014-09-15

Timothy G. Wolff v. Roger M. Coates
, the required date for filing must change. But the statute requires notice be given within ten days of the oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15326 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
and maintenance of a driveway for residential use. No evidence has been cited that the zoning change required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28212 - 2007-02-26

[PDF] State v. James D. Krause
was frustrated. We recognize that a change in parole eligibility is not a new factor warranting sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3196 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
“for the reasons previously noted,” because “[n]othing has changed.” In the court’s prior order denying Smith’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98301 - 2013-06-17

COURT OF APPEALS
would change at his age, forty-five. Considering the offenses before it, as well as Williams’ prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84332 - 2012-07-02