Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30811 - 30820 of 45836 for paternity test paper work.

COURT OF APPEALS
Here, the circuit court appeared to treat these two circumstances as a two-part conjunctive test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48859 - 2010-04-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Rushing, and his two friends. So he fails on the first [aspect of the test for “newly discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96325 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
as a fifth or sixth offense, one count of refusing to take a test for intoxication, and one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95750 - 2013-04-23

[PDF] NOTICE
, Jones moved for postconviction relief, seeking a Brady hearing and DNA testing.3 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35937 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, reasonably warrant that intrusion.’” Id. (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 21). Objective and common sense tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82117 - 2012-05-07

COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 707 (1997). ¶9 We agree with the State that Rones cannot satisfy this test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29110 - 2007-07-23

Arlandis Issac v. Gerald A. Berge
the substantial evidence test, that is, whether reasonable minds could arrive at the same conclusion reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19753 - 2005-09-28

[PDF] State v. Lawrence J. Gaston
, there is no DNA testing? A. No. Q. The physician’s report shows no lacerations, no abrasions, no bruising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16284 - 2017-09-21

State v. Floyd Worth
, and never has been. The test for harmless error "whether of omission or commission, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11046 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58159 - 2014-09-15