Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30821 - 30830 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 30821 - 30830 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Michael B. Ilkka
stated. Ilkka was charged in Iowa County with fourth-offense drunk driving. After denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16175 - 2005-03-31
stated. Ilkka was charged in Iowa County with fourth-offense drunk driving. After denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16175 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rudy A. Gerardo
of §§ 939.05 and 943.10(1)(a), Stats. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13508 - 2005-03-31
of §§ 939.05 and 943.10(1)(a), Stats. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13508 - 2005-03-31
Vadim Katznelson v. Stuart Hoffman
and Hoffman both argued at the pretrial hearings that at issue was a motion to dismiss. Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9623 - 2005-03-31
and Hoffman both argued at the pretrial hearings that at issue was a motion to dismiss. Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9623 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Victor Vasquez appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32128 - 2014-09-15
. Victor Vasquez appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32128 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. AMCO filed three summary judgment motions, all of which were denied, and the case proceeded to trial.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93365 - 2013-02-25
. AMCO filed three summary judgment motions, all of which were denied, and the case proceeded to trial.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93365 - 2013-02-25
State v. Norbert W. Ellis
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief.[1] Ellis argues his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5860 - 2005-03-31
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief.[1] Ellis argues his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5860 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Bonnie argues that the court erroneously exercised its discretion in granting Anthony’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952535 - 2025-05-07
. Bonnie argues that the court erroneously exercised its discretion in granting Anthony’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952535 - 2025-05-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570471 - 2022-09-27
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570471 - 2022-09-27
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Farrell contends that trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130180 - 2014-11-24
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Farrell contends that trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130180 - 2014-11-24
State v. David R. Messner
weapon and obstructing an officer and from an order denying his postconviction motion. In appeal no. 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15622 - 2005-03-31
weapon and obstructing an officer and from an order denying his postconviction motion. In appeal no. 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15622 - 2005-03-31