Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30831 - 30840 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 30831 - 30840 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
County of Milwaukee v. John P. Baumgartner
a charge on its own motion or to amend the pleadings sua sponte, this court reverses and remands
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4469 - 2005-03-31
a charge on its own motion or to amend the pleadings sua sponte, this court reverses and remands
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4469 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” On November 11, Wood filed a motion to dismiss based on STB’s failure to sign the complaint. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=434379 - 2021-09-30
.” On November 11, Wood filed a motion to dismiss based on STB’s failure to sign the complaint. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=434379 - 2021-09-30
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief. Hogenson argues his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103040 - 2013-10-14
his motion for postconviction relief. Hogenson argues his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103040 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from an order denying his postconviction motion without a hearing. Manns contends that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242082 - 2019-06-20
from an order denying his postconviction motion without a hearing. Manns contends that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242082 - 2019-06-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Kevin M. Lipscomb appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief based on ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645724 - 2023-04-19
). Kevin M. Lipscomb appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief based on ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645724 - 2023-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
appeared, by counsel, on July 5, 2006. A notice of appearance was filed, together with a motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32974 - 2008-06-09
appeared, by counsel, on July 5, 2006. A notice of appearance was filed, together with a motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32974 - 2008-06-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Stone has petitioned this court for leave to appeal a nonfinal order denying his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167920 - 2017-09-21
Stone has petitioned this court for leave to appeal a nonfinal order denying his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167920 - 2017-09-21
State v. John L. Dye, Jr.
motion.[2] He submits that the trial court erred: (1) in finding his attorney was not prejudicially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5897 - 2005-03-31
motion.[2] He submits that the trial court erred: (1) in finding his attorney was not prejudicially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5897 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to be produced over his objection. 2 We affirm the order denying his motions. Sentence Modification Motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168269 - 2017-09-21
to be produced over his objection. 2 We affirm the order denying his motions. Sentence Modification Motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168269 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
convictions. Studenec also argues the circuit court improperly denied his motion for mistrial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55725 - 2010-10-18
convictions. Studenec also argues the circuit court improperly denied his motion for mistrial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55725 - 2010-10-18