Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30831 - 30840 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that evening. Smith testified at trial that she told these lies because she was “scared” and “tired.” Dopke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197982 - 2017-10-18

WI App 36 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP344 Complete Title of ...
resolved in favor of Briggs by the trial court, holding that Briggs had no liability for the Thompson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59740 - 2011-03-29

State v. Daniel L. Gaulrapp
of §§ 161.41(3m) and 161.41(3r), Stats., respectively. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10688 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jacqueline Dixson v. Wisconsin Health Organization Insurance Corporation
appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Milwaukee County (County). The appellants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13462 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Williams indicated she wanted to enter a plea because she did not think she would get a fair trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134578 - 2017-09-21

Spencer H. Lemenager v. Century Capital Group
, 511 N.W.2d 849, 852 (1994). Since neither party disputes the trial court's findings of fact, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7856 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 961.41(1m)(h)5. (2007-08).1 Martinez appeals, arguing that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56839 - 2014-09-15

2010 WI APP 124
trial, for two counts of obstructing an officer in violation of Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1), and a single
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53280 - 2010-10-25

[PDF] WI APP 36
-motions for summary judgment were resolved in favor of Briggs by the trial court, holding that Briggs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59740 - 2014-09-15

State v. Dann P. Knippel
. Knippel argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence underlying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11164 - 2005-03-31