Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30841 - 30850 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 30841 - 30850 of 58285 for speedy trial.
2006 WI APP 182
was the shooter. On a date originally set for trial, new information came to light and the case was set over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26343 - 2006-09-26
was the shooter. On a date originally set for trial, new information came to light and the case was set over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26343 - 2006-09-26
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court denied Greene’s motion. ¶4 At Greene’s jury trial, and over his objection, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31926 - 2008-02-25
. The court denied Greene’s motion. ¶4 At Greene’s jury trial, and over his objection, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31926 - 2008-02-25
Robert J. McElwain v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin
of Wisconsin.[1] The trial court granted summary judgment because it found as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3896 - 2005-03-31
of Wisconsin.[1] The trial court granted summary judgment because it found as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3896 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. B. Davis Investment, LLC
affirming the City of Milwaukee Municipal Court judgment, following a bench trial, assessing a forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5174 - 2017-09-19
affirming the City of Milwaukee Municipal Court judgment, following a bench trial, assessing a forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5174 - 2017-09-19
City of Milwaukee v. B. Davis Investment, LLC
the City of Milwaukee Municipal Court judgment, following a bench trial, assessing a forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5174 - 2005-03-31
the City of Milwaukee Municipal Court judgment, following a bench trial, assessing a forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5174 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court scheduled trial for the remaining parties for November 29, 2016. Cole asked to postpone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248820 - 2019-10-23
court scheduled trial for the remaining parties for November 29, 2016. Cole asked to postpone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248820 - 2019-10-23
The Boerke Company, Inc. v. Protein Genetics, Inc.
, we reverse and remand for a trial to determine the meaning of “sold” in the agreement and to resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6664 - 2005-03-31
, we reverse and remand for a trial to determine the meaning of “sold” in the agreement and to resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6664 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kohler Company v. The Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York
cross-appealed concerning the trial court's conclusion that before an alleged breach of a contractual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8688 - 2017-09-19
cross-appealed concerning the trial court's conclusion that before an alleged breach of a contractual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8688 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Scott R. Weber
it is the maximum allowed under the law. Finally, Scott challenges the trial court’s decision regarding probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14438 - 2017-09-21
it is the maximum allowed under the law. Finally, Scott challenges the trial court’s decision regarding probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14438 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jennifer V.
) the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the order because the facts upon which it was based occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9900 - 2017-09-19
) the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the order because the facts upon which it was based occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9900 - 2017-09-19