Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30871 - 30880 of 68259 for law.

[PDF] Calumet County Department of Human Services v. Randall H.
that if there is a conflict, then the federal law preempts. ¶16 We see this case as presenting a threshold question
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16507 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
had twenty-four years of law enforcement experience and sixteen years of experience as a detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90012 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the Fourth Amendment; thus, Wisconsin’s search and seizure law “parallels” that of federal law. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202754 - 2017-11-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
requires us to interpret § 802.06. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175770 - 2017-09-21

State v. Carlos C.
adequate and detailed information concerning the juvenile’s alleged violations of state criminal law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5094 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Roger P. VanderLogt
of the several victims. Charges are multiplicitous if they are identical in law and fact. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11111 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Scot Deering v. William Wangerin
. In February 2004, the trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law and a decision on remedies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17878 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute is a question of law we review de novo.” Waupaca County v. K.E.K., 2021 WI 9, ¶16, 395 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058517 - 2026-02-25

[PDF] WI APP 117
was submitted on the brief of Amy R. Siebel of Seibel Law Offices LLC, Mequon and Grant F. Langley, city
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68348 - 2014-09-15

John Marder v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
to the Board “for further action under a correct interpretation of the law.” On appeal, Marder argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6970 - 2005-03-31