Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30881 - 30890 of 45836 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 30881 - 30890 of 45836 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Dana E.
the egregious standard set forth in B.L.J. We concluded it consists of a two- part, sequential test. Kelly S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4246 - 2017-09-19
the egregious standard set forth in B.L.J. We concluded it consists of a two- part, sequential test. Kelly S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4246 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Dana E.
the egregious standard set forth in B.L.J. We concluded it consists of a two- part, sequential test. Kelly S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4247 - 2017-09-19
the egregious standard set forth in B.L.J. We concluded it consists of a two- part, sequential test. Kelly S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4247 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are “without merit.” In published cases applying the “clearly stronger” test, our supreme court appears
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345091 - 2021-03-11
are “without merit.” In published cases applying the “clearly stronger” test, our supreme court appears
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345091 - 2021-03-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and random drug testing. As the sentencing court noted, large amounts of cash are a tool used by drug
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238920 - 2019-04-09
and random drug testing. As the sentencing court noted, large amounts of cash are a tool used by drug
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238920 - 2019-04-09
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
be considered sound trial strategy.” Id. at 689 (quoted source omitted). The prejudice test is whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971667 - 2025-06-18
be considered sound trial strategy.” Id. at 689 (quoted source omitted). The prejudice test is whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971667 - 2025-06-18
COURT OF APPEALS
with the well-established test for sufficiency of the evidence: [I]n reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143247 - 2015-06-17
with the well-established test for sufficiency of the evidence: [I]n reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143247 - 2015-06-17
State v. Singkeo Inphachack
). Inphachack does not dispute the first prong of the test. He focuses his challenge on the second prong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9362 - 2005-03-31
). Inphachack does not dispute the first prong of the test. He focuses his challenge on the second prong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9362 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
test.” Robert then concludes his scope of review argument as follows: Robert’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110995 - 2014-04-28
test.” Robert then concludes his scope of review argument as follows: Robert’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110995 - 2014-04-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. at 662. ‘“The test is, was [the weapon] carried so as not to be discernible by ordinary observation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83806 - 2014-09-15
. at 662. ‘“The test is, was [the weapon] carried so as not to be discernible by ordinary observation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83806 - 2014-09-15
State v. Douglas E. Howk, Jr.
test which asks, “Under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6973 - 2005-03-31
test which asks, “Under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6973 - 2005-03-31