Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30891 - 30900 of 46938 for shows.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 25, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
the trial court’s discretionary determination if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26877 - 2006-10-24

CA Blank Order
, on which Shi was copied. Even if Shi had been able to carry his burden of showing that the Schauer emails
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116659 - 2014-07-06

State v. Lee Norman Brown
, Brown must show that “there is a reasonable probability that, but for trial counsel’s unprofessional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14656 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
should have allowed him to introduce evidence showing that the testimony of Gary Klotz, one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102207 - 2013-09-23

City of Oshkosh v. Gail L. Palecek
. The record shows that the trial court employed a mental reasoning process from the facts of record and its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11608 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert Glickman
within the time specified and absent a showing to this court of his inability to pay the costs within
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17123 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
discretion. 2 The court concluded that Gandy did not show the existence of a new factor. ¶8 We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150724 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kevin L. Sendejo
for a change,” id., and absent any indication in the record showing that the trial court authorized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4067 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Randy R. Mertz
of the issues raised, including oral or written rulings or decisions showing the trial court’s reasoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8617 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a Bangert violation and will not, as a matter of law, be sufficient to show that the defendant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178968 - 2017-09-21