Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3091 - 3100 of 17369 for Cost.

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Leslie J. Webster
foreclosure cases Webster subsequently sought and was awarded fees and costs for his services as trustee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17374 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gary L. Gordon
discretion in assessing him costs associated with one of the State’s witnesses. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4104 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Gary L. Gordon
in assessing him costs associated with one of the State’s witnesses. ¶2 Because we conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4104 - 2017-09-20

WI App 42 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2410 Complete Title of...
in 1980, the Secondary Payer Statute was intended to lower the costs of the Medicare program and to shift
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94147 - 2013-04-23

[PDF] WI APP 42
was intended to lower the costs of the Medicare program and to shift those costs to responsible third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94147 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] JD-1763B: Order Concerning Recoupment
Order for Recoupment of Costs of Legal Services, is amended to provide that the obligation
/formdisplay/JD-1763B.pdf?formNumber=JD-1763B&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2021-02-02

[PDF] John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
outside the record. Under these circumstances, it would be unfair to require Mary to pay costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12370 - 2017-09-21

John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
be unfair to require Mary to pay costs on appeal. McClellan is therefore not entitled to costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12370 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Fifter to pay twenty-five percent of her prison wages for restitution, costs, and surcharges. DOC
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243532 - 2019-07-09

Ronald Collison v. City of Milwaukee Board of Review
not “take into consideration any environmental liabilities.” For reasons related, in part, to the cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5441 - 2005-03-31