Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3091 - 3100 of 68466 for did.
Search results 3091 - 3100 of 68466 for did.
State v. Linda B.-S.
or services. She complains that the State did not prove that Racine County Human Services (RCHS) was diligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9792 - 2005-03-31
or services. She complains that the State did not prove that Racine County Human Services (RCHS) was diligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9792 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and that Tarik did not have good cause for failing to contact Lauren and Quincy. Following a dispositional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55216 - 2010-10-06
, and that Tarik did not have good cause for failing to contact Lauren and Quincy. Following a dispositional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55216 - 2010-10-06
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. James H. Martin
Attorney Martin did not file an answer to the Board’s complaint, the referee, Attorney David R. Friedman
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17481 - 2017-09-21
Attorney Martin did not file an answer to the Board’s complaint, the referee, Attorney David R. Friedman
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17481 - 2017-09-21
State v. Wesley S. Leonard
the revocation order and that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14961 - 2005-03-31
the revocation order and that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14961 - 2005-03-31
Dana J. Mignognia v. Salvatore Mignognia
did not include attorney’s fees, but instead included interest. Salvatore does not explain why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5950 - 2005-03-31
did not include attorney’s fees, but instead included interest. Salvatore does not explain why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5950 - 2005-03-31
City of Madison v. Robert R. Schultz
the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in ruling that the proposed evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15158 - 2005-03-31
the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in ruling that the proposed evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15158 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andre Derrick Wingo
in misdemeanor cases, applied to this case, that statute did not in fact apply. Nor did the defendant agree
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17460 - 2005-03-31
in misdemeanor cases, applied to this case, that statute did not in fact apply. Nor did the defendant agree
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17460 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Flynn contends this argument should have been raised because: (1) his trial counsel did not hire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90212 - 2012-12-10
. Flynn contends this argument should have been raised because: (1) his trial counsel did not hire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90212 - 2012-12-10
State v. Robert F. Jones
did not have reasonable suspicion that he was armed and therefore the officer’s patdown search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19063 - 2005-07-18
did not have reasonable suspicion that he was armed and therefore the officer’s patdown search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19063 - 2005-07-18
[PDF]
State v. Robert F. Jones
paraphernalia and obstructing an officer. He argues the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19063 - 2017-09-21
paraphernalia and obstructing an officer. He argues the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19063 - 2017-09-21