Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30901 - 30910 of 83778 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 30901 - 30910 of 83778 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Mitchel P.
said, he said” case. Picking up on that theme, we portray Mitchel’s argument in the following manner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19537 - 2005-09-06
said, he said” case. Picking up on that theme, we portray Mitchel’s argument in the following manner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19537 - 2005-09-06
COURT OF APPEALS
immediate police investigation.” Id., ¶26. In cases such as drunk driving, in which there is a potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103423 - 2013-10-29
immediate police investigation.” Id., ¶26. In cases such as drunk driving, in which there is a potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103423 - 2013-10-29
State v. Guillermo Gutierrez
that the prosecution in this case violated his double jeopardy protection. Like the trial court, we reject Gutierrez’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5982 - 2005-03-31
that the prosecution in this case violated his double jeopardy protection. Like the trial court, we reject Gutierrez’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5982 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from a cocaine delivery at which Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31023 - 2007-12-03
and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from a cocaine delivery at which Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31023 - 2007-12-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
months after Seuell filed his appellate brief in this case. Lasanske addressed all of the cases Seuell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125310 - 2017-09-21
months after Seuell filed his appellate brief in this case. Lasanske addressed all of the cases Seuell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125310 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Spencer G. Breitreiter v. Clifton Gunderson & Company
practicing in this area.” While not required in every malpractice case, expert testimony will generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10898 - 2017-09-20
practicing in this area.” While not required in every malpractice case, expert testimony will generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10898 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
verdict of acquittal following presentation of the State’s case and should not have instructed the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54574 - 2014-09-15
verdict of acquittal following presentation of the State’s case and should not have instructed the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54574 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for continuing to do so in the future. The court then stated: This is possibly the first case I’ve seen where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43710 - 2009-11-18
for continuing to do so in the future. The court then stated: This is possibly the first case I’ve seen where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43710 - 2009-11-18
[PDF]
State v. Susan M. Curtis
cause for arrest.” Id. at 316. ¶9 The question in this case is whether the facts observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2939 - 2017-09-19
cause for arrest.” Id. at 316. ¶9 The question in this case is whether the facts observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2939 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
advising him to enter no contest pleas, leaving Starck unaware of weaknesses in the State’s case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102416 - 2017-09-21
advising him to enter no contest pleas, leaving Starck unaware of weaknesses in the State’s case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102416 - 2017-09-21