Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30911 - 30920 of 73371 for ha.
Search results 30911 - 30920 of 73371 for ha.
[PDF]
State v. Carl E. Cunningham
prior criminal record were improper because they were unsubstantiated and prejudicial. Cunningham has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6570 - 2017-09-19
prior criminal record were improper because they were unsubstantiated and prejudicial. Cunningham has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6570 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Roehl Transport, Inc. v. Larry O. Loken
was on the Ohio Turnpike at about the time the injury would have occurred. Another witness, Dennis Wreps, has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13542 - 2017-09-21
was on the Ohio Turnpike at about the time the injury would have occurred. Another witness, Dennis Wreps, has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13542 - 2017-09-21
Waylon M. Redding v. David H. Schwarz
considered because “we just deemed it inappropriate because he’s already been confined has not been released
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3561 - 2005-03-31
considered because “we just deemed it inappropriate because he’s already been confined has not been released
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3561 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
injury.” ¶9 The phrase “or other serious bodily injury” has a distinct meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27271 - 2006-12-19
injury.” ¶9 The phrase “or other serious bodily injury” has a distinct meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27271 - 2006-12-19
State v. Dale Pultz
the question “is one which the trial court has far better opportunity to determine than a reviewing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8199 - 2005-03-31
the question “is one which the trial court has far better opportunity to determine than a reviewing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8199 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the odor of intoxicants alone “on a person who has alighted from a vehicle after it has stopped” did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85108 - 2014-07-15
that the odor of intoxicants alone “on a person who has alighted from a vehicle after it has stopped” did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85108 - 2014-07-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
that, “[w]here the time for appeal has expired, the court requires the assertion of an arguably meritorious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27306 - 2006-12-04
that, “[w]here the time for appeal has expired, the court requires the assertion of an arguably meritorious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27306 - 2006-12-04
State v. Joseph A. Roe
that has been given.” Nevertheless, the trial court determined that Roe’s refusal to submit to a test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10637 - 2005-03-31
that has been given.” Nevertheless, the trial court determined that Roe’s refusal to submit to a test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10637 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2019AP1608-CRNM 2019AP1609-CRNM
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355156 - 2021-04-14
that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2019AP1608-CRNM 2019AP1609-CRNM
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355156 - 2021-04-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2016AP45-CRNM
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174102 - 2017-09-21
are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2016AP45-CRNM
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174102 - 2017-09-21