Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30911 - 30920 of 83882 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 30911 - 30920 of 83882 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Dorian V. Neal
, the State advised that it did not intend to introduce those statements in its case-in-chief.[1] In light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12617 - 2005-03-31
, the State advised that it did not intend to introduce those statements in its case-in-chief.[1] In light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12617 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert Fecke
, in the case of a prison, is guilty of a Class I felony. Fecke argues that the State failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5366 - 2005-03-31
, in the case of a prison, is guilty of a Class I felony. Fecke argues that the State failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5366 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank J. Obuchowski
in this case. We also hold that the “reasonable purpose” of Quartana was satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15219 - 2005-03-31
in this case. We also hold that the “reasonable purpose” of Quartana was satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15219 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jaamal D. Bell
the circumstances of the case and counsel’s conduct and strategy will not be overturned unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20010 - 2005-10-25
the circumstances of the case and counsel’s conduct and strategy will not be overturned unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20010 - 2005-10-25
COURT OF APPEALS
the negligence case she filed against her landlord, Timothy Kilps. The trial court precluded certain testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55309 - 2010-10-12
the negligence case she filed against her landlord, Timothy Kilps. The trial court precluded certain testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55309 - 2010-10-12
[PDF]
State v. Jeriline Campbell
of any traffic offenses. ¶6 While commenting that this was a close case, the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3151 - 2017-09-19
of any traffic offenses. ¶6 While commenting that this was a close case, the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3151 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
participated in a walking quorum. It is SOP for the majority. Did it happen in this case? Only time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240450 - 2019-05-09
participated in a walking quorum. It is SOP for the majority. Did it happen in this case? Only time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240450 - 2019-05-09
COURT OF APPEALS
by another perpetrator was not exculpatory under the facts of this case, the circuit court erred by granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36269 - 2009-04-27
by another perpetrator was not exculpatory under the facts of this case, the circuit court erred by granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36269 - 2009-04-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
blood draw case and concluded that the blood draw in this case satisfied § 343.305(5)(b). Id. at 266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154646 - 2017-09-21
blood draw case and concluded that the blood draw in this case satisfied § 343.305(5)(b). Id. at 266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154646 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dorian V. Neal
statements in its case-in-chief. 1 In light of the State’s intention not to introduce Odems’ statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12617 - 2017-09-21
statements in its case-in-chief. 1 In light of the State’s intention not to introduce Odems’ statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12617 - 2017-09-21