Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30921 - 30930 of 91571 for 1.
Search results 30921 - 30930 of 91571 for 1.
State v. Jerald J. Hupe
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62(1), Stats. This opinion is subject to further editing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10348 - 2005-03-31
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62(1), Stats. This opinion is subject to further editing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10348 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Douglas Dahlin, Jr. v. James B. Dahlin
. Before Dykman, P.J., Eich and Roggensack, JJ. ¶1 EICH, J. This case arises out of the probate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16124 - 2017-09-21
. Before Dykman, P.J., Eich and Roggensack, JJ. ¶1 EICH, J. This case arises out of the probate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16124 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles Jones
County: KITTY K. BRENNAN and MAXINE A. WHITE, Judges. Affirmed. ¶1 SCHUDSON, J.1 Charles Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16139 - 2017-09-21
County: KITTY K. BRENNAN and MAXINE A. WHITE, Judges. Affirmed. ¶1 SCHUDSON, J.1 Charles Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16139 - 2017-09-21
Certification
the following: 1. A single cause of action in bad faith remains viable when a simultaneous claim in breach
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45005 - 2009-12-29
the following: 1. A single cause of action in bad faith remains viable when a simultaneous claim in breach
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45005 - 2009-12-29
CA Blank Order
(10) (2011-12)[1] (authorizing appellate review of suppression determinations notwithstanding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108969 - 2014-03-09
(10) (2011-12)[1] (authorizing appellate review of suppression determinations notwithstanding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108969 - 2014-03-09
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer and Fine, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Robert Moralle Madden appeals, pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33114 - 2008-06-23
. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer and Fine, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Robert Moralle Madden appeals, pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33114 - 2008-06-23
State v. Gary L. Klotz
. Before Nettesheim, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Gary L. Klotz, acting pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5188 - 2005-03-31
. Before Nettesheim, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Gary L. Klotz, acting pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5188 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
A. WAGNER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41824 - 2009-10-05
A. WAGNER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41824 - 2009-10-05
County of Jefferson v. Sean S. Lynch
: jacqueline r. erwin, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 VERGERONT, P.J.[1] Sean Lynch appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5734 - 2005-03-31
: jacqueline r. erwin, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 VERGERONT, P.J.[1] Sean Lynch appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5734 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2021-22).1 The no-merit report sets forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733988 - 2023-11-28
to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2021-22).1 The no-merit report sets forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733988 - 2023-11-28