Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30921 - 30930 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 30921 - 30930 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
and No. 2010AP507-CR 2 939.05 (2007–08),1 and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58298 - 2014-09-15
and No. 2010AP507-CR 2 939.05 (2007–08),1 and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58298 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an order denying Gossens’ motion for postconviction relief. Gossens has filed a response to the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696164 - 2023-08-29
and an order denying Gossens’ motion for postconviction relief. Gossens has filed a response to the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696164 - 2023-08-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for plea withdrawal must establish that plea withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007609 - 2025-09-11
motion for plea withdrawal must establish that plea withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007609 - 2025-09-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of substantial battery and from an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his no-contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82078 - 2014-09-15
of substantial battery and from an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his no-contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82078 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it is directed fails to timely respond). ¶6 The Mardans subsequently filed a motion for declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250614 - 2019-11-26
it is directed fails to timely respond). ¶6 The Mardans subsequently filed a motion for declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250614 - 2019-11-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
in favor of First Bank of Highland Park (“the bank”) and from the order denying their motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50100 - 2014-09-15
in favor of First Bank of Highland Park (“the bank”) and from the order denying their motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50100 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Eric Pittman
of delivery of heroin. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13994 - 2014-09-15
of delivery of heroin. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13994 - 2014-09-15
Janet Steinbruner v. The McClone Agency, Inc.
the motion, stating that McClone had “ample opportunity” to present this evidence at the trial. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19826 - 2005-10-04
the motion, stating that McClone had “ample opportunity” to present this evidence at the trial. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19826 - 2005-10-04
[PDF]
Stanley Slaven v. Janice L. Graeber
defense that Graeber was immune from liability under § 48.981(4), STATS.,2 and filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13593 - 2017-09-21
defense that Graeber was immune from liability under § 48.981(4), STATS.,2 and filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13593 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eric Pittman
an order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm the judgment and the order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13994 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm the judgment and the order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13994 - 2005-03-31