Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30921 - 30930 of 59125 for quit claim deed.

State v. John M. Albrecht
or exculpatory evidence. Because he has not demonstrated prejudice, his claim must fail. As his final challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11961 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
there would be arguable merit to a claim that trial counsel was ineffective in its representation of Freeman
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971667 - 2025-06-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
determined that trial counsel did not provide Hernandez with the claimed inaccurate information about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733988 - 2023-11-28

Dewey M. Purnell v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
Employment Act. Purnell must demonstrate three elements to claim a violation of the WFEA. First, he must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10998 - 2005-03-31

Edward M. Moran v. Property Management Concepts
the dismissal of three separate small claims actions, which we have consolidated for purposes of this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7405 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
No. 2022AP2009-CR 6 cannot make a standalone claim on that ground. Mitchell cannot seek reversal under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742961 - 2023-12-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
). No. 2014AP2056 4 nevertheless claims he complied with alternative methods of service outlined in WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160562 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Rick J. Gurholt
any such law. However, we need not reach the merits of Gurholt’s double jeopardy claim because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7230 - 2017-09-20

H.T. Hackney Company v. National Petroleum, Inc.
for the debt. It first claims that National was not a party to the agreement with Hackney because Bhardwaj’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5373 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] R.W. Docks & Slips v. State
dismissing Docks’ claim against the Wisconsin Department of Natural No. 99-2904 2 Resources
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16187 - 2017-09-21