Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30931 - 30940 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 30931 - 30940 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
State v. Darrin D. Grosskopf
N.W.2d 659. Ultimately, though, the standard of review is immaterial in this case because we would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6184 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 659. Ultimately, though, the standard of review is immaterial in this case because we would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6184 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI App 169
2009 WI App 169 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008XX702-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44483 - 2010-03-08
2009 WI App 169 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008XX702-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44483 - 2010-03-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
exercised its discretion in this case. Although the court was admittedly dismissive of the Static-99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89103 - 2014-09-15
exercised its discretion in this case. Although the court was admittedly dismissive of the Static-99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89103 - 2014-09-15
Marathon County v. Edward F.W.
party or any attorney in the case or if the juror has a financial interest in the case. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2623 - 2005-03-31
party or any attorney in the case or if the juror has a financial interest in the case. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2623 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 47
eFiling for all other cases, as set forth in S. Ct. Order 19-02C & 20-07C, 2023 WI 10 (issued Feb. 21
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668161 - 2023-06-12
eFiling for all other cases, as set forth in S. Ct. Order 19-02C & 20-07C, 2023 WI 10 (issued Feb. 21
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668161 - 2023-06-12
[PDF]
Brian L. Read v. Village of Fox Point
case law, the trial court concluded that the limitation, “for the use and enjoyment of the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8238 - 2017-09-19
case law, the trial court concluded that the limitation, “for the use and enjoyment of the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8238 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133307 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133307 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
Lundsten, Sherman and Kloppenburg, JJ. Christopher Peete appeals judgments in two criminal cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137157 - 2015-03-08
Lundsten, Sherman and Kloppenburg, JJ. Christopher Peete appeals judgments in two criminal cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137157 - 2015-03-08
[PDF]
John M. O'Neill v. Indian Hills First Addition Association, Inc.
to the O’Neill litigation. O’Neill also claimed that the case was not sufficiently complex to warrant over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13270 - 2017-09-21
to the O’Neill litigation. O’Neill also claimed that the case was not sufficiently complex to warrant over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13270 - 2017-09-21
Brian L. Read v. Village of Fox Point
. Relying upon established case law, the trial court concluded that the limitation, “for the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8238 - 2005-03-31
. Relying upon established case law, the trial court concluded that the limitation, “for the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8238 - 2005-03-31