Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30931 - 30940 of 83807 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 30931 - 30940 of 83807 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
and denied Kevin’s motion to vacate and dismiss. DISCUSSION ¶5 This case involves the time requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32138 - 2014-09-15
and denied Kevin’s motion to vacate and dismiss. DISCUSSION ¶5 This case involves the time requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32138 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for continuing to do so in the future. The court then stated: This is possibly the first case I’ve seen where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43710 - 2009-11-18
for continuing to do so in the future. The court then stated: This is possibly the first case I’ve seen where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43710 - 2009-11-18
State v. Orlander Isabell
be prima facie evidence of fraud in any such case. Further, § 49.12(1) provides: Any person who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9014 - 2012-01-05
be prima facie evidence of fraud in any such case. Further, § 49.12(1) provides: Any person who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9014 - 2012-01-05
State v. Robert Fecke
, in the case of a prison, is guilty of a Class I felony. Fecke argues that the State failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5366 - 2009-03-02
, in the case of a prison, is guilty of a Class I felony. Fecke argues that the State failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5366 - 2009-03-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
blood draw case and concluded that the blood draw in this case satisfied § 343.305(5)(b). Id. at 266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154646 - 2017-09-21
blood draw case and concluded that the blood draw in this case satisfied § 343.305(5)(b). Id. at 266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154646 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeriline Campbell
of any traffic offenses. ¶6 While commenting that this was a close case, the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3151 - 2017-09-19
of any traffic offenses. ¶6 While commenting that this was a close case, the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3151 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in his case. He further contends that his sentence was unduly harsh. We reject Wilcher’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308953 - 2020-12-02
in his case. He further contends that his sentence was unduly harsh. We reject Wilcher’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308953 - 2020-12-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
elicited evidence regarding a threat in its case-in-chief. ¶2 The trial court held that her argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252447 - 2020-01-22
elicited evidence regarding a threat in its case-in-chief. ¶2 The trial court held that her argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252447 - 2020-01-22
State v. Jaamal D. Bell
the circumstances of the case and counsel’s conduct and strategy will not be overturned unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20010 - 2005-10-25
the circumstances of the case and counsel’s conduct and strategy will not be overturned unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20010 - 2005-10-25
State v. Anthony A. Parker
2001 WI App 111 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2672 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 111 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2672 - 2005-03-31