Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30941 - 30950 of 97687 for court records search online.

State v. Jimmie Davison
2003 WI 89 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 01-0826-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16490 - 2005-03-31

State v. Tyler J. K.
and its subsequent motion for reconsideration. The court ordered that the requested pupil records
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1235 - 2005-01-25

[PDF] State v. Tyler J. K.
for reconsideration. The court ordered that the requested pupil records be produced, but ordered that the records
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1235 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Appeal No. 2010AP3120 Cir. Ct. No. 1985CF79
disputes the court’s authority to seal the records and contends that it has been denied access
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72304 - 2014-09-15

Certification
] The circuit court sealed Stanley’s conditional release plan as a confidential treatment record under Wis. Stat
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72304 - 2011-10-19

J. Marshall Osborn v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
to create new records in order to comply with Osborn's request. ¶2 Both parties appealed and the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16432 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ltr-Ct Comm
reference to the Wisconsin Public Records Law, Wis. Stat. § 19.31, in proposed Supreme Court Rule (SCR
/supreme/docs/1901ltrwappendix.pdf - 2019-04-10

Cindy Schultz v. Victoria Wellens
., they must also do this within the disclosure requirements of the Open Records law” that, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10372 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Cindy Schultz v. Victoria Wellens
” that, the trial court determined, did not authorize disclosure of the requested records. “A motion to quash
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10372 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] J. Marshall Osborn v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
records, Osborn filed a mandamus action. The circuit court concluded that the University was required
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16432 - 2017-09-21