Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30941 - 30950 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 30941 - 30950 of 83389 for simple case search.
[PDF]
WI 19
2013 WI 19 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2012AP1590-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93125 - 2014-09-15
2013 WI 19 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2012AP1590-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93125 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Reynaldo F. v. Christal M.
2004 WI App 106 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-2687
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6954 - 2017-09-20
2004 WI App 106 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-2687
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6954 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the court denied Charleston’s motion to dismiss, and the case was resolved on April 28, 2016, by plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197970 - 2017-10-18
, the court denied Charleston’s motion to dismiss, and the case was resolved on April 28, 2016, by plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197970 - 2017-10-18
The Estate of Martha Burgess v. Carl Peterson
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-1455 & 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10853 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-1455 & 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10853 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
competency to exercise subject matter jurisdiction over this case; (3) Kanz did not present sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54225 - 2010-09-08
competency to exercise subject matter jurisdiction over this case; (3) Kanz did not present sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54225 - 2010-09-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
),1 postconviction motion. We affirm. ¶2 The procedural background of this case is convoluted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465710 - 2021-12-21
),1 postconviction motion. We affirm. ¶2 The procedural background of this case is convoluted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465710 - 2021-12-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, was willing to take the case. However, while the attorney was solicited in November 2006, he informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34503 - 2008-11-03
, was willing to take the case. However, while the attorney was solicited in November 2006, he informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34503 - 2008-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
was of no consequence in this case. DISCUSSION “Probable Cause to Believe” for PBT ¶9 Levasseur argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107792 - 2014-02-05
was of no consequence in this case. DISCUSSION “Probable Cause to Believe” for PBT ¶9 Levasseur argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107792 - 2014-02-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion. ¶3 During its case-in-chief, the State called the investigator, and elicited testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81562 - 2014-09-15
the motion. ¶3 During its case-in-chief, the State called the investigator, and elicited testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81562 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court denied both requests, reasoning the parties were married, Scott was part of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82546 - 2012-05-14
. The circuit court denied both requests, reasoning the parties were married, Scott was part of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82546 - 2012-05-14