Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30961 - 30970 of 62306 for child support.
Search results 30961 - 30970 of 62306 for child support.
[PDF]
State v. Jermaine M. Webb
at the time of the shooting. Shooting someone in the back at close range supports a finding of intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10405 - 2017-09-20
at the time of the shooting. Shooting someone in the back at close range supports a finding of intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10405 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
—the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence support a contrary finding. Noll v. Dimiceli’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137157 - 2015-03-08
—the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence support a contrary finding. Noll v. Dimiceli’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137157 - 2015-03-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
such as coercion, the lack of a factual basis to support the charge, ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017896 - 2025-10-01
such as coercion, the lack of a factual basis to support the charge, ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017896 - 2025-10-01
Melanie O'Kane v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
supports LIRC’s findings of fact concerning O’Kane’s job performance. We review LIRC’s decision directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7166 - 2005-03-31
supports LIRC’s findings of fact concerning O’Kane’s job performance. We review LIRC’s decision directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7166 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is discretionary. However, he fails to engage with that standard in any meaningful way to support his argument
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773400 - 2024-03-07
is discretionary. However, he fails to engage with that standard in any meaningful way to support his argument
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773400 - 2024-03-07
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 805.17(2) (2011-12). The court’s credibility determination is supported by the record and it reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92929 - 2013-02-18
. § 805.17(2) (2011-12). The court’s credibility determination is supported by the record and it reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92929 - 2013-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
legal standard, and by reaching a conclusion not supported by facts in the record. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42672 - 2009-10-26
legal standard, and by reaching a conclusion not supported by facts in the record. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42672 - 2009-10-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
presented did not adequately support that request. Defense counsel offered no evidence to corroborate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36453 - 2014-09-15
presented did not adequately support that request. Defense counsel offered no evidence to corroborate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36453 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
WI 66, ¶2, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1. The court’s statement was supported by its observation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128335 - 2017-09-21
WI 66, ¶2, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1. The court’s statement was supported by its observation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128335 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings of facts are upheld unless clearly erroneous and not supported by the record. See Gerth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77700 - 2012-02-07
court’s findings of facts are upheld unless clearly erroneous and not supported by the record. See Gerth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77700 - 2012-02-07