Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30971 - 30980 of 58531 for speedy trial.
Search results 30971 - 30980 of 58531 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Yolanda M.
initial appearance on the amended petitions with an attorney and a trial date was set. ¶5 Yolanda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2365 - 2017-09-19
initial appearance on the amended petitions with an attorney and a trial date was set. ¶5 Yolanda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2365 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
John O. Shaline v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
damage to their apartment building. State Farm contends that the trial court erroneously interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3728 - 2017-09-19
damage to their apartment building. State Farm contends that the trial court erroneously interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3728 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court’s denial of her suppression motion. Kostuck-Hass contends that the search warrant leading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135364 - 2015-02-24
the trial court’s denial of her suppression motion. Kostuck-Hass contends that the search warrant leading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135364 - 2015-02-24
Tony A. Henderson v. Milwaukee County
appeals from the trial court final order granting summary judgment to Milwaukee County and dismissing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9548 - 2005-03-31
appeals from the trial court final order granting summary judgment to Milwaukee County and dismissing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9548 - 2005-03-31
State v. City of Rhinelander
of damages. On the insurance companies’ renewed motions for summary judgment, the trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3099 - 2005-03-31
of damages. On the insurance companies’ renewed motions for summary judgment, the trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3099 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Marketta A. Hughes
be a “person responsible for the welfare of the child.” The trial court denied the motion. She now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18519 - 2017-09-21
be a “person responsible for the welfare of the child.” The trial court denied the motion. She now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18519 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to withdraw his plea because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93190 - 2014-09-15
to withdraw his plea because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93190 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jennifer V.
) the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the order because the facts upon which it was based occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9900 - 2005-03-31
) the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the order because the facts upon which it was based occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9900 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Barron County v. Brian T.
of the percentage of income standards here conflicts with the Consumer Credit Protection Act; (3) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4619 - 2017-09-19
of the percentage of income standards here conflicts with the Consumer Credit Protection Act; (3) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4619 - 2017-09-19
State v. Brett R.T.
challenged the denial of his demand for a jury trial during the adjudicative phase of these proceedings. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13475 - 2005-03-31
challenged the denial of his demand for a jury trial during the adjudicative phase of these proceedings. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13475 - 2005-03-31