Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30991 - 31000 of 69114 for he.

COURT OF APPEALS
to drinking four to five beers, the odor of alcohol on his breath, his close proximity to the bar at which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49237 - 2010-04-27

Kathryn A. Pinter v. Linda Pinter
of a life insurance policy he carried through his employer, Tax Air Freight, Inc. Robert's ex-wife from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9710 - 2005-03-31

State v. Demetrius J. Grayson
appeared to be crack cocaine from a person he recognized from a previous encounter as Grayson. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25771 - 2006-08-29

WI App 39 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1056-CR Complete Title...
typically carry a license plate in the front and in the back. So he believed that Boyd’s car should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77363 - 2013-04-24

[PDF] Jennifer A. Croop v. Tom A. Sweeney
, and from possessing a firearm. He claims there is insufficient evidence to support the No(s). 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15289 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
factors at sentencing. He also argues his sentence was unduly harsh. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66183 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
matching the description in the alert. He followed the vehicle for about a hundred feet and ran
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71927 - 2011-10-11

COURT OF APPEALS
person” under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (2007-08).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postverdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55817 - 2010-10-26

[PDF] NOTICE
, the officer involved testified that, on August 20, 2006, at approximately 3:05 a.m., he observed a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30997 - 2014-09-15

Nate A. Lindell v. Matthew Frank
First Amendment rights; the rules under which he was charged are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26482 - 2006-09-13