Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 311 - 320 of 82604 for case status.
Search results 311 - 320 of 82604 for case status.
Tammy Turner v. Gene Dencker Buick-Pontiac, Inc.
2001 WI App 28 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16274 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 28 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16274 - 2005-03-31
Little Sissabagama Lake Shore Owners Association, Inc. v. Town of Edgewater
and known in every case; the taxpayer is requesting tax exempt status for a certain parcel of property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11012 - 2005-03-31
and known in every case; the taxpayer is requesting tax exempt status for a certain parcel of property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11012 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard A. Moeck
of this case. At the first break, Moeck moved for a mistrial. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15048 - 2005-03-31
of this case. At the first break, Moeck moved for a mistrial. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15048 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
., Case No. 08FO4691. Griswold appeared at the status conference. Dane County moved to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52098 - 2010-07-14
., Case No. 08FO4691. Griswold appeared at the status conference. Dane County moved to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52098 - 2010-07-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2021-22)2 because the State failed to provide sufficient notice of his repeater status, as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640715 - 2023-04-04
) (2021-22)2 because the State failed to provide sufficient notice of his repeater status, as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640715 - 2023-04-04
[PDF]
Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. Lawrence F. Waddick
and 1998, his filing of Certifications of Status of Pending Cases during that time that falsely
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17447 - 2017-09-21
and 1998, his filing of Certifications of Status of Pending Cases during that time that falsely
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17447 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
take as true, that Mile Bluff applied for and obtained “rural health clinic” status for the clinics
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208758 - 2018-02-22
take as true, that Mile Bluff applied for and obtained “rural health clinic” status for the clinics
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208758 - 2018-02-22
[PDF]
Frontsheet
; failing to notify the client of the status of the case; failing to notify the client of the dismissal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353232 - 2021-05-04
; failing to notify the client of the status of the case; failing to notify the client of the dismissal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353232 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in another case was highly relevant to the sentence imposed because his revocation status was discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047911 - 2025-12-09
in another case was highly relevant to the sentence imposed because his revocation status was discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047911 - 2025-12-09
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 20-06 - Letter Response to the Court from Jacquelynn Rothstein
(In the Matter of Modification of the Emeritus Status, Penalties for Late Payment of Dues and Fees, Technical
/supreme/docs/2006letter.pdf - 2021-01-26
(In the Matter of Modification of the Emeritus Status, Penalties for Late Payment of Dues and Fees, Technical
/supreme/docs/2006letter.pdf - 2021-01-26