Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 311 - 320 of 947 for fla.
Search results 311 - 320 of 947 for fla.
State v. John E. Olson
Testimony: Admissible Evidence, Pedagogical Device, or Violation of the Federal Rules of Evidence, 24 Fla
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11160 - 2005-03-31
Testimony: Admissible Evidence, Pedagogical Device, or Violation of the Federal Rules of Evidence, 24 Fla
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11160 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mark Shimkus v. Kenneth Sondalle
. And, in Haag v. State, 591 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 1992), and Woody v. State, 833 P.2d 257 (Ok. 1992), the Florida
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2229 - 2017-09-19
. And, in Haag v. State, 591 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 1992), and Woody v. State, 833 P.2d 257 (Ok. 1992), the Florida
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2229 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Scot A. Czarnecki
is … whether the assumed name was adopted with intent to defraud.”); Green v. State, 76 So. 2d 645, 648 (Fla
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15802 - 2017-09-21
is … whether the assumed name was adopted with intent to defraud.”); Green v. State, 76 So. 2d 645, 648 (Fla
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15802 - 2017-09-21
Badger III Limited Partnership v. Howard
brokers to “`sublet'” their licenses, see Previews, Inc. v. Murff, 502 So.2d 1317, 1318 (Fla. Dist. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8289 - 2005-03-31
brokers to “`sublet'” their licenses, see Previews, Inc. v. Murff, 502 So.2d 1317, 1318 (Fla. Dist. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8289 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dion Matthews
); Chavez v. State, 832 So. 2d 730, 749 (Fla. 2002) (fifty-four hours of repeated interrogation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4636 - 2017-09-19
); Chavez v. State, 832 So. 2d 730, 749 (Fla. 2002) (fifty-four hours of repeated interrogation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4636 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph K. Bryant
); State v. Foster, 562 So. 2d 808, 809 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990) (“the routine gathering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2377 - 2017-09-19
); State v. Foster, 562 So. 2d 808, 809 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990) (“the routine gathering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2377 - 2017-09-19
Norman S. De Ruyter v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Consumers Ins. Co., 788 So.2d 355, 361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001) (finding no ambiguity in “like kind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6923 - 2005-03-31
Consumers Ins. Co., 788 So.2d 355, 361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001) (finding no ambiguity in “like kind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6923 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 268
. 2d 369, 371-72 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004); People v. Hayden, 788 N.E.2d 106, 113- 14 (Ill. App. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30936 - 2014-09-15
. 2d 369, 371-72 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004); People v. Hayden, 788 N.E.2d 106, 113- 14 (Ill. App. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30936 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992) (defendant’s two profane statements, separated in time only long enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87972 - 2014-09-15
(Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992) (defendant’s two profane statements, separated in time only long enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87972 - 2014-09-15
Mark Shimkus v. Kenneth Sondalle
. at 799. And, in Haag v. State, 591 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 1992), and Woody v. State, 833 P.2d 257 (Ok. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2229 - 2005-03-31
. at 799. And, in Haag v. State, 591 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 1992), and Woody v. State, 833 P.2d 257 (Ok. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2229 - 2005-03-31