Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 311 - 320 of 21560 for warrants.
Search results 311 - 320 of 21560 for warrants.
COURT OF APPEALS
warrant that were filed in 2000 did not identify him with reasonable certainty, and thereby failed to toll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94413 - 2013-03-25
warrant that were filed in 2000 did not identify him with reasonable certainty, and thereby failed to toll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94413 - 2013-03-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
lacked personal jurisdiction because the criminal complaint and arrest warrant that were filed in 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94413 - 2014-09-15
lacked personal jurisdiction because the criminal complaint and arrest warrant that were filed in 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94413 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven H. Robinson
to the trial court that the application for the search warrant lacked probable cause because it contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12525 - 2017-09-21
to the trial court that the application for the search warrant lacked probable cause because it contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12525 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Sherry L. Kryzaniak
entered their home with neither their consent nor a warrant because no exigent circumstances existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2547 - 2017-09-19
entered their home with neither their consent nor a warrant because no exigent circumstances existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2547 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steven H. Robinson
residence. He argued to the trial court that the application for the search warrant lacked probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12525 - 2005-03-31
residence. He argued to the trial court that the application for the search warrant lacked probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12525 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sherry L. Kryzaniak
entered their home with neither their consent nor a warrant because no exigent circumstances existed. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2547 - 2005-03-31
entered their home with neither their consent nor a warrant because no exigent circumstances existed. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2547 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Kryzaniak
entered their home with neither their consent nor a warrant because no exigent circumstances existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2546 - 2017-09-19
entered their home with neither their consent nor a warrant because no exigent circumstances existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2546 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael J. Kryzaniak
entered their home with neither their consent nor a warrant because no exigent circumstances existed. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2546 - 2005-03-31
entered their home with neither their consent nor a warrant because no exigent circumstances existed. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2546 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steiney J. Richards
and announce" prior to entering his motel room to execute a search warrant, any evidence seized must
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16855 - 2017-09-21
and announce" prior to entering his motel room to execute a search warrant, any evidence seized must
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16855 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steiney J. Richards
to "knock and announce" prior to entering his motel room to execute a search warrant, any evidence seized
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16855 - 2005-03-31
to "knock and announce" prior to entering his motel room to execute a search warrant, any evidence seized
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16855 - 2005-03-31