Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 311 - 320 of 556 for widths.
Search results 311 - 320 of 556 for widths.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The State did not provide any evidence about the width of 70th Avenue that might have permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167747 - 2017-09-21
. The State did not provide any evidence about the width of 70th Avenue that might have permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167747 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the easement and set its width at nineteen feet. A pier was placed in the new location every year through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35483 - 2014-09-15
the easement and set its width at nineteen feet. A pier was placed in the new location every year through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35483 - 2014-09-15
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
. § 66.021 (West Supp. 2000). [2] The parties suggest that the width of the Black River in the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2816 - 2005-03-31
. § 66.021 (West Supp. 2000). [2] The parties suggest that the width of the Black River in the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2816 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the easement and set its width at nineteen feet. A pier was placed in the new location every year through 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35483 - 2009-02-10
the easement and set its width at nineteen feet. A pier was placed in the new location every year through 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35483 - 2009-02-10
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
. § 66.021 (West Supp. 2000). [2] The parties suggest that the width of the Black River in the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2813 - 2005-03-31
. § 66.021 (West Supp. 2000). [2] The parties suggest that the width of the Black River in the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2813 - 2005-03-31
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
. § 66.021 (West Supp. 2000). [2] The parties suggest that the width of the Black River in the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2814 - 2005-03-31
. § 66.021 (West Supp. 2000). [2] The parties suggest that the width of the Black River in the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2814 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 33
purposes” and the 9.464-acre parcel as “Road Dedication for Future Highway Purposes (Right-of-Way Width
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138279 - 2017-09-21
purposes” and the 9.464-acre parcel as “Road Dedication for Future Highway Purposes (Right-of-Way Width
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138279 - 2017-09-21
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
. § 66.021 (West Supp. 2000). [2] The parties suggest that the width of the Black River in the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2815 - 2005-03-31
. § 66.021 (West Supp. 2000). [2] The parties suggest that the width of the Black River in the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2815 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Stevens Point v. Michael C. Wirtz
then crossed the centerline, by at least a tire width, into the nearest westbound lane. ¶5 At that point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3844 - 2017-09-20
then crossed the centerline, by at least a tire width, into the nearest westbound lane. ¶5 At that point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3844 - 2017-09-20
WI App 33 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP1092 Complete Title of...
as “Road Dedication for Future Highway Purposes (Right-of-Way Width Varies).” All parties agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138279 - 2015-04-28
as “Road Dedication for Future Highway Purposes (Right-of-Way Width Varies).” All parties agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138279 - 2015-04-28